Part 1
考官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
考生
MMM, definitely yes, when I was a child, uh, going to going to a playground is is more popular than recent recent out recent time. So when so I used to went to a park with my family, it was.
考官
Do you still like going to parks now?
考生
I would say no because I'm now I'm now I am ordered. That child background is boring to me now. I prefer to live in my house.
考官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
考生
Definitely yes, because there are no parks in my city. If pretty pass uh emerge, I will go to bed and work walks several time.
考官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
考生
I just don't care about specific park parts. I just want to go a pretty parks such as have a fountain. Yeah. So every pass is OK, every pass I like.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
分數: 56.0建議: 답변이 긍정적이긴 하지만 문법 오류, 중복 발화(ums, 반복)와 부정확한 시제 사용이 점수를 떨어뜨립니다. 더 자연스럽고 간결한 토픽 문장으로 시작하고, 연결어(for example, because 등)를 사용해 구체적인 기억이나 이유를 하나 추가하세요. 문장은 3–4개 이내로 유지하고 과거 시제는 규칙적으로 사용하세요.
範例: Yes, I loved going to parks when I was a child. For example, I often visited the local playground with my family on weekends, where I played on the swings and climbed the jungle gym. Those visits were fun because I could spend time outdoors with my siblings.
Do you still like going to parks now?
分數: 42.0建議: 의도를 표현하려는 점은 좋지만 문장이 불분명하고 어휘와 문법 오류(‘ordered’, ‘child background’)가 있습니다. 거절할 때는 명확한 이유를 하나 제시하고, 연결어(so, because, although)를 사용해 논리적으로 전개하세요. 감정이나 빈도(rarely, sometimes)를 추가하면 더 구체적입니다.
範例: No, I don't go to parks much anymore because I prefer staying at home to relax. Sometimes I go for a short walk, but I rarely spend long periods in parks like I did as a child.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
分數: 48.0建議: 의견은 분명하지만 사실 관계(‘there are no parks’)가 과장되었거나 문법적 오류가 있습니다. 가능성을 말할 때는 조건문을 정확히 사용하고 구체적인 이유(health, community space 등)를 덧붙이세요. 어색한 표현을 피하고 간결하게 말하세요.
範例: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because public green spaces improve people's health and create places for community activities. If new parks were built near my home, I would go there for walks and exercise regularly.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
分數: 50.0建議: 관심을 표현했지만 표현이 중복되고 문법과 어휘 선택에 문제가 있습니다. 구체적 선호(예: fountain, playground, lake)를 하나 또는 두 개 제시하고 이유를 설명하세요. 문장을 깔끔하게 정리해 자연스럽게 들리도록 하세요.
範例: I don't have a particular park in mind, but I prefer attractive parks with features like fountains or flower gardens. Those elements make a park more relaxing and pleasant, so I would choose such places in the future.
× So when so I used to went to a park with my family, it was.
✓ So when I was a child I used to go to a park with my family.
The student used 'used to went,' which mixes 'used to' (which should be followed by the base form) with a past tense verb. Use 'used to' + base verb to describe habitual past actions: 'used to go'. Also removed filler words and corrected word order for clarity.
× I would say no because I'm now I'm now I am ordered.
✓ I would say no because now I am older.
The phrase 'I am ordered' is incorrect; the correct adjective is 'older' to indicate increased age. Duplicate fillers 'I'm now I'm now' were removed. Use 'now I am older' for present state.
× That child background is boring to me now.
✓ That childhood experience is boring to me now.
'Child background' is an unusual collocation in English. 'Childhood experience' or simply 'my childhood' is natural. Adjusted word form from 'child' to 'childhood' and reordered to match English noun phrase structure.
× I prefer to live in my house.
✓ I prefer staying at home.
'Prefer to live in my house' is grammatically acceptable but awkward in this context; 'prefer staying at home' is a more natural present preference. Changed verb form to gerund after 'prefer' which is common (prefer doing).
× Definitely yes, because there are no parks in my city.
✓ Definitely yes, because there are not many parks in my city.
Saying 'there are no parks' may be inaccurate and sounds absolute; the student likely meant scarcity. 'There are not many parks' is more natural. Grammatically both are valid, but adjusted for likely intended meaning.
× If pretty pass uh emerge, I will go to bed and work walks several time.
✓ If a nice park opens nearby, I will go there and take walks several times.
Original sentence has multiple errors: 'pretty pass uh emerge' is unclear—interpreted as 'a nice park opens'; 'go to bed and work walks' is incorrect sequence—interpreted as 'go there and take walks'; 'several time' should be 'several times'. Rewrote to convey intended future conditional meaning.
× I just don't care about specific park parts.
✓ I just don't care about specific parks.
'Park parts' is incorrect; likely meant 'specific parks'. 'Parts' was the wrong noun. Corrected to plural 'parks' to match 'specific'. Also removed redundant 'about' structure.
× I just want to go a pretty parks such as have a fountain.
✓ I just want to go to pretty parks that have a fountain.
Multiple article and preposition errors: 'go a pretty parks' should be 'go to pretty parks' (use 'to' after 'go' and no article before plural 'parks'); 'such as have a fountain' is incorrect clause form—use 'that have a fountain' or 'with a fountain'.
× Yeah. So every pass is OK, every pass I like.
✓ Yeah. So every park is OK; I like any park.
'Pass' is a mispronunciation/spelling of 'park'. Changed to 'park'. Also adjusted sentence to natural expressions: 'every park is OK' and 'I like any park' to express general preference.