Part 1
考官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
考生
Yes, definitely. My parents used to take me to the park because I loved learning, running around and looking at bugs and plants.
考官
Do you still like going to parks now?
考生
Yes, absolutely. I'm living in Seoul so there is there are well maintained park around the Hull River so I usually visit the Han River park to take her W from my hectic routine.
考官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
考生
Yes, absolutely, because I I prefer untouched landscapes because because of because of it has much more peaceful and inspiring than overly manicured parks.
考官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
考生
I would love to go to the park located around the Strapod station because I plan to go to the London for my MA Fashion Design course in London College of Fashion, so I will visit that park with my friends.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
分數: 82.0建議: 문장 구조는 자연스럽지만 약간의 구체성 부족과 어휘 선택에서 개선 여지가 있습니다. 예를 들어 ‘learning’은 문맥상 모호하므로 구체적으로 무엇을 배웠는지(자연 관찰, 새와 식물 이름 등)를 밝히고, 연결어를 사용해 답변을 더 유창하게 만드세요. 또한 문장을 2~3개로 나누어 명확한 토픽 문장과 뒷받침 세부사항을 제공하세요.
範例: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. My parents often took me so I could explore nature — I enjoyed learning about different plants and watching insects, especially butterflies. Because of that, I spent hours running around and discovering new things.
Do you still like going to parks now?
分數: 58.0建議: 문법과 발음 실수, 단어 선택 오류가 있습니다(예: 'there is there are', 'Hull River', 'take her W'). 문장을 간결하게 만들고 장소 이름과 활동을 정확히 표현하세요. 연결어를 사용해 이유를 분명히 하고, 한두 개의 구체적 활동을 제시해 답을 풍부하게 만드세요.
範例: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks. I live in Seoul and often visit the Han River Park because it is well maintained and close to my home. Going there helps me relax and clear my mind after a hectic day, especially when I walk or sit by the water.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
分數: 50.0建議: 중복된 말과 문장 흐름이 나쁩니다(반복된 'because'). 비교를 명확히 하고 구체적인 이유와 예를 덧붙이세요. 적절한 연결어(‘because’, ‘so’, ‘which’)를 한 번만 사용하고, 비교 표현을 통해 의견을 분명히 하세요.
範例: Yes, I would. I prefer more natural, untouched landscapes because they feel more peaceful and inspiring compared with overly manicured parks. For example, wildflower meadows and wooded areas allow for quieter walks and better opportunities to observe wildlife.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
分數: 65.0建議: 내용은 괜찮지만 지명과 문법 오류('Strapod station', 'the London')가 있습니다. 이유와 계획을 더 명확히 제시하고 한두 가지 구체적 활동(피크닉, 사진 촬영 등)을 포함시키세요. 문장을 분리해 토픽 문장과 세부 설명을 구분하세요.
範例: Yes, I would love to visit the park near Stratford station in London. I am going to study for an MA in Fashion Design at the London College of Fashion next year, and I plan to explore that park with my friends, take photos, and have picnics there.
× Yes, absolutely. I'm living in Seoul so there is there are well maintained park around the Hull River so I usually visit the Han River park to take her W from my hectic routine.
✓ Yes, absolutely. I live in Seoul, and there are well-maintained parks along the Han River, so I usually visit them to get away from my hectic routine.
Multiple issues: incorrect tense and continuous form (use simple present 'I live' for a current state) [ID 6], duplicate 'there is there are' and incorrect article/number (should be plural 'parks' and correct verb 'there are') [ID 1 and 22], wrong preposition 'around' better as 'along' for a river [ID 11], wrong river name consistency (Hull River vs Han River) - corrected to Han River to match later mention, incorrect phrase 'take her W' seems garbled and should be 'get away' (sentence structure/word choice) [ID 26], and pronoun/reference consistency for 'them' referring to parks [ID 12]. Suggestion: use simple present for states, ensure subject-verb agreement with 'there are' + plural noun, choose correct prepositions with geographical features ('along the river'), and use clear verbs ('visit them to get away from my hectic routine').
× Yes, absolutely, because I I prefer untouched landscapes because because of because of it has much more peaceful and inspiring than overly manicured parks.
✓ Yes, absolutely, because I prefer untouched landscapes; they are much more peaceful and inspiring than overly manicured parks.
Issues: repetition 'I I' and 'because because of' are redundant and incorrect (sentence structure/repetition) [ID 26], incorrect use of 'because of' followed by clause — should use 'because' for clauses or 'because of' with a noun phrase [ID 16], incorrect pronoun/reference and verb form 'it has' referring to plural 'landscapes' should be 'they are' (subject-verb agreement and pronoun use) [ID 27 and 12], incorrect comparative construction 'much more peaceful and inspiring than' should compare adjectives correctly with 'more' + adjective or use 'much more' before adjective phrase (kept in corrected sentence). Suggestion: remove repetitions, use correct connector ('because' or 'because of'), ensure pronoun matches plural noun, and use clear comparative structure.
× I would love to go to the park located around the Strapod station because I plan to go to the London for my MA Fashion Design course in London College of Fashion, so I will visit that park with my friends.
✓ I would love to go to the park near Strapod Station because I plan to go to London for my MA in Fashion Design at the London College of Fashion, so I will visit that park with my friends.
Problems: unnecessary article 'the' before 'London' (use no article for most city names) [ID 22], preposition 'around' is less natural than 'near' for a station location [ID 11], improper capitalization and wording for institution and degree — use 'MA in Fashion Design at the London College of Fashion' (sentence structure and article use) [ID 26 and 22], 'Strapod station' should be 'Strapod Station' (proper noun capitalization) and keep place names consistent, and overall clarity improved. Suggestion: remove incorrect articles with city names, use 'near' for proximity, and phrase degrees and institutions in standard English.