自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 先直接回答问题，用“No”代替不自然的“Now”。注意保持过去时一致，应将“prefer”改为“preferred”。句中的原因重复使用了多个“so”，建议用“because”和“as a result”等连接词组织内容，并补充一个具体细节，例如你在家通常玩什么。

範例: No, I didn’t have a bike as a child. My parents thought cycling was dangerous and worried I might fall and hurt myself, so they preferred me to play indoors. I usually played board games instead.

建議: 回答开头清楚，但后面的例子与观点矛盾：如果自行车不流行，而且大家更常坐汽车或公共交通，就不应该说经常看到父母或朋友骑车。可以改为“很少看到”，并补充一个具体原因，例如城市距离较远、交通繁忙或公共交通便利。注意“bikes”在这里泛指自行车，表达自然。

範例: No, I don’t think bikes are very popular where I live. Most people prefer driving or taking public transport, especially because the buses and trains are convenient. As a result, I rarely see my friends riding bikes.

× Now, I didn't own a bike when I was a child because my parents thought it was so dangerous so then they were worried I might fall and get hurt so they prefer I play safe games at home.

✓ No, I didn't own a bike when I was a child because my parents thought it was too dangerous. They were worried that I might fall and get hurt, so they preferred that I play safe games at home.

这段话描述的是童年时发生的情况，因此动词 prefer 应使用过去式 preferred，与 thought 和 were 保持时态一致。可以将句子中的过去时间事件统一使用一般过去时。

× Now, I didn't own a bike when I was a child because my parents thought it was so dangerous so then they were worried I might fall and get hurt so they prefer I play safe games at home.

✓ No, I didn't own a bike when I was a child because my parents thought it was too dangerous. They were worried that I might fall and get hurt, so they preferred that I play safe games at home.

原句用 because 引出原因后，又连续使用 so 和 so then，造成连词重复、句子关系不清。可将原因部分用 because 连接，再用 so 引出结果；必要时用句号拆分长句，使逻辑更清楚。