自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 回答直接表达了“没有自行车”，并给出了家庭经济状况这一原因，基本结构是清楚的。但存在明显的重复和语法问题，例如“and and”“in the in my family”“when I when I was a child”；“we are not rich”应改为过去时“we were not well-off”。结尾“that's it”不够自然，也没有提供更具体的细节。建议使用“没有 + 原因 + 简单结果”的结构，并控制在2—3句内，避免反复解释同一信息。

範例: No, I didn’t. There were four children in my family, and my parents couldn’t afford to buy each of us a bike. As a result, I usually played with my friends near my home instead.

建議: 回答有明确观点，也进行了过去与现在的比较，这是优点。不过答案在“and they can”处中断，导致意思不完整；“there was there wasn't a lot of bikes”存在重复和主谓不一致，应改为“there weren’t many bikes”。“when they are free”可以更自然地说成“in their free time”。建议补充一个具体原因或例子，例如骑自行车有助于锻炼、缓解交通拥堵或保护环境，并使用“whereas”“because”等连接词使逻辑更完整。

範例: Yes, I think bikes are becoming increasingly popular in my country. When I was a child, there weren’t many people who rode bikes, whereas today many people cycle in their free time. This is partly because cycling is good exercise and helps people avoid traffic jams.

× ...we are not rich in my family so I couldn't have a bike when I was a child...

✓ ...we weren't rich, so I couldn't have a bike when I was a child...

这里谈论的是“小时候”的过去情况，因此系动词也应使用过去式。将现在时 are 改为过去式 weren't。更自然的表达是 “my family wasn't rich”。

× There wasn't a lot of bikes.

✓ There weren't a lot of bikes.

bikes 是可数名词复数，因此 be 动词应使用复数形式 weren't，而不是单数形式 wasn't。

× There was there wasn't a lot of bikes.

✓ There weren't a lot of bikes.

There be 句型中只能保留一个 be 动词。原句重复使用了 was 和 wasn't；表示“没有很多自行车”时，应使用 “There weren't a lot of bikes.”

× ...more and more people want to ride a bike when they are free and they can

✓ ...more and more people want to ride bikes when they are free and can ride them.

原句在 can 后面没有完整的动词或宾语，句子没有结束。情态动词 can 后面需要接动词原形，因此补充 “ride them”，使句子结构完整。