自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Answer the question directly and avoid repeating or correcting yourself. Use the past tense consistently: say “I didn’t have” or “I had,” not both. Organize the response with a clear answer, followed by one specific reason or detail. Also, use natural expressions such as “when I was a child” and “I was too young to ride it.”

範例: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. My family had one, but I was too young to ride it safely. I started cycling when I was about eight years old.

建議: Give a direct answer and use a natural adjective such as “very” or “quite” instead of “firmly popular.” Avoid repetition, for example, “cycling cycling” and “park in to park.” Complete your final idea and use linking words to connect the reason and example. You could also mention that bicycles are practical and environmentally friendly.

範例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially among students and urban families. They are affordable, convenient, and easy to park. For example, I often see students cycling to university and leaving their bikes near the campus. They are also a good way to reduce traffic and pollution.

× Since my since when my childhood I don't have bike often.

✓ During my childhood, I did not often have a bike.

The original sentence contains repeated and incorrectly ordered words, which makes its structure unclear. Use the prepositional phrase during my childhood to introduce the time period, followed by a complete clause.

× Since my since when my childhood I don't have bike often.

✓ During my childhood, I did not often have a bike.

The question asks about the student's childhood, so the answer should use the past tense. Change do not have to did not have.

× Since my since when my childhood I don't have bike often.

✓ During my childhood, I did not often have a bike.

The singular countable noun bike needs the indefinite article a because it refers to one bike in a general sense.

× We had in a childhood we have bicycle, we used room in that.

✓ We had bicycles during my childhood, and we used to ride them.

Because the answer describes the student's childhood, past-tense forms are needed. Use had and used to ride instead of the present-tense form have.

× We had in a childhood we have bicycle, we used room in that.

✓ We had bicycles during my childhood, and we used to ride them.

The subject we refers to more than one person, and the sentence describes bicycles in general, so the plural noun bicycles is appropriate.

× We had in a childhood we have bicycle, we used room in that.

✓ We had bicycles during my childhood, and we used to ride them.

The original contains several clauses joined without a clear grammatical structure. Join the two complete ideas with and, and use them to refer clearly to the bicycles.

× So we have not enough age to ride a bike.

✓ So we were not old enough to ride a bike.

The situation occurred in the past, so were is required instead of have. The natural expression is be old enough, not have enough age.

× So we have not enough age to ride a bike.

✓ So we were not old enough to ride a bike.

Enough normally modifies an adjective in this expression: old enough. The phrase enough age is not natural here.

× So I had.

✓ So, I did not have one.

The original sentence is incomplete in meaning because had does not clearly state what the student had. Use one to replace bike and form a complete negative answer.

× I think bicycles are firmly popular in my country, especially among the students and the families in the city.

✓ I think bicycles are very popular in my country, especially among students and families in cities.

Firmly does not naturally modify popular in this context. Use the intensifying adverb very. The revised sentence also uses plural groups in a general statement.

× They usually use their bikes because they are affordable and convenient to park in to park.

✓ They usually use their bikes because they are affordable and convenient to park.

The preposition in is unnecessary after park. The correct structure is convenient to park, meaning that finding a place to park the bikes is easy.

× I often see lot of students cycling cycling in the universities and leave their bikes in the near the campus, which makes the cycling and the.

✓ I often see a lot of students cycling at universities and leaving their bikes near the campus, which makes cycling convenient.

The singular countable noun lot requires the article a in the expression a lot of. The phrase the near the campus is also incorrectly formed; use near the campus.

× I often see lot of students cycling cycling in the universities and leave their bikes in the near the campus, which makes the cycling and the.

✓ I often see a lot of students cycling at universities and leaving their bikes near the campus, which makes cycling convenient.

After see, parallel activities can be expressed with -ing forms: cycling and leaving. Using leaving keeps the two activities grammatically parallel.

× I often see lot of students cycling cycling in the universities and leave their bikes in the near the campus, which makes the cycling and the.

✓ I often see a lot of students cycling at universities and leaving their bikes near the campus, which makes cycling convenient.

Use at universities to describe the general location of the activity and near the campus to describe the position of the bicycles. The preposition in is not used before near in this phrase.

× I often see lot of students cycling cycling in the universities and leave their bikes in the near the campus, which makes the cycling and the.

✓ I often see a lot of students cycling at universities and leaving their bikes near the campus, which makes cycling convenient.

The original sentence ends with an incomplete clause, which makes the meaning unclear. Complete the relative clause with an adjective such as convenient and remove the repeated word cycling.