Part 1
考官
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
考生
I do have a bike when I was a child.
考官
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
考生
I do think bikes are popular in my country.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
分數: 40.0建議: Grammar and tense are incorrect and the sentence is unnatural. Start with a clear topic sentence in the past tense, then add one or two specific supporting details linked logically. Use linking words such as “when” or “and” to join ideas. Keep it concise (no more than 5 sentences).
範例: Yes, I had a bicycle when I was a child. It was a small red bike with training wheels, and I learned to ride it in my neighbourhood when I was about six. Because my parents encouraged me to practise every weekend, I became confident riding on busy streets by the time I was ten.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
分數: 55.0建議: The answer is grammatically acceptable but too short and repetitive. Give a clear topic sentence and then add specific reasons or examples, using linking words such as “because,” “for example,” or “however.” Vary vocabulary (e.g., popular, common, widely used) and provide concrete details to support your view.
範例: Yes, bicycles are quite popular in my country because many people use them for short trips and exercise. For example, in cities there are dedicated bike lanes and many commuters cycle to work, while in rural areas people often use bikes for shopping and visiting neighbours.
× I do have a bike when I was a child.
✓ I had a bike when I was a child.
The sentence uses present-tense 'do have' but the time reference 'when I was a child' requires past tense. Use simple past 'had' to match the time frame. Suggestion: use 'I had' for past states; avoid using auxiliary 'do' in affirmative past statements.
× I do think bikes are popular in my country.
✓ I think bikes are popular in my country.
The use of auxiliary 'do' in 'I do think' is unnecessary for a simple present affirmative statement. Use the simple present 'I think' to express general beliefs. The original form is not grammatically wrong but is emphatic; for neutral answer, remove 'do'.