自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 回答总体可以理解，但存在几点问题：1) 表达不够简洁自然（如“five, four wheels”混乱且冗余）。2) 结构上缺少清晰的主题句加一到两句支持细节（应控制在最多5句内）。3) 细节可以更具体（例如年龄、学会骑车的经历或情感）。改进时注意使用连词使句子更连贯并使用准确词汇描述车轮和保护轮。

範例: Yes, I did. I had a small bicycle with two training wheels at the back when I was about five, which helped me keep my balance. I remember my father holding the seat at first, and after a few weeks I was able to ride without any help.

建議: 回答清晰且有具体理由，但可进一步提升：1) 使用更多连接词（例如“because, moreover, for example”）使逻辑更顺畅。2) 提供更具体的细节或比较（如具体基础设施类型、使用场景或与其他交通方式的比较）。3) 句子可稍作扩展但仍控制在5句内，避免重复。

範例: Yes, definitely. Bikes are very common in cities, especially for delivery riders and short trips, because they are cheap and convenient. Moreover, Sydney has many dedicated bike lanes and bike racks, which makes cycling safer and more practical than driving for short distances.

× At first I had a bike with five, four wheels and had two training wheels on the back for balance.

✓ At first I had a bike with five or four wheels and two training wheels on the back for balance.

句子中原先的“five, four wheels”用法不正确，表示可选数量时应使用“or”连接；同时“had two training wheels on the back”可以合并为更简洁的结构。建议在列举可选项时使用“or”，并保持句子简洁明了。

× So when I rode the bike, because I was so small, it wouldn't fall over.

✓ So when I rode the bike, because I was so small, it wouldn't fall over.

句子整体时态为过去（rode, was），但使用“wouldn't”来表示过去常态的结果是可以接受的（表示习惯性或过去的倾向）。因此不需要更改时态。此处仅提醒：若要更明确地表示过去的持续事实，可改为“it didn't fall over”来直接用过去时。建议根据说话者想表达的语气选择“wouldn't”（过去常态/倾向）或“didn't”（简单过去事实）。

× We have quite well developed infrastructure for bicycles in Sydney.

✓ We have a quite well-developed infrastructure for bicycles in Sydney.

“quite well developed”需要连接词和连字符来修饰名词，习惯上形容词短语作定语前置时使用连字符“well-developed”。此外名词前通常加不定冠词“a”来表示“一套/一项基础设施”。因此改为“a quite well-developed infrastructure”更自然。