自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Be direct, use correct tense, avoid repetition and add a brief reason or detail. For example, say whether you ever owned one as a child, and give one short supporting detail (family choice, safety, or cost). Keep to 1–3 sentences and use simple linking words if needed.

範例: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child because my parents thought it was unsafe for me to ride on busy roads.

建議: Give a clear opinion first, then support it with two concise, specific reasons using linking words (for example, 'because' and 'also'). Reduce hesitations and complete your final clause so the answer ends logically. Use vocabulary like 'restrictions', 'economic situation', 'access', or 'culture' appropriately.

範例: I don’t think bikes are very popular in my country because many families cannot afford them, and there are cultural restrictions that limit women's use of bicycles.

× No, I haven't had. Unfortunately, I haven't had.

✓ No, I didn't have one. Unfortunately, I didn't.

The question asks about possession in the past ('when you were a child'), so the past simple should be used, not the present perfect. 'I haven't had' is present perfect and inappropriate with a specific past time. Use 'didn't have' or 'I didn't have one' to indicate lack of possession in childhood. Suggestion: Use past simple for actions or states tied to a specific past time (e.g., 'I didn't have a bike when I was a child').

× Well, I don't think so because you know, in my country, umm, there is a lot of restriction for women.

✓ Well, I don't think so because, you know, in my country, there are a lot of restrictions for women.

The noun 'restriction' should be plural when referring to many limitations, and the verb 'there is' must agree with the plural noun, so use 'there are.' Also change 'a lot of restriction' to 'a lot of restrictions.' Suggestion: Match 'there is/are' to singular/plural nouns and use plural form for countable nouns when referring to multiple items.

× Umm, so, and also in terms of umm, the economic, it's very low level and that's why umm so the family can't concentrate on the.

✓ Also, in terms of the economy, it is at a very low level, and that's why families can't concentrate on it.

Multiple issues: 'in terms of' should be followed by a noun phrase; 'the economic' is incorrect—use 'the economy.' 'Low level' needs article and clearer phrasing 'at a very low level.' 'The family can't concentrate on the.' is incomplete and misuses the definite article and preposition; use plural 'families' if speaking generally and complete the object with 'it' referring to the economy or 'on their needs.' Suggestion: Use correct noun forms ('economy' not 'economic'), ensure completeness of clauses, choose singular/plural consistently, and include the appropriate preposition or pronoun at the end.