自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Give a past-tense, slightly longer reply that directly answers and adds a brief relevant detail. Use past tense for childhood and one supporting detail (where/why/how often). Keep it natural and within 1–2 sentences.

範例: Yes, I did. I had a red bicycle when I was about eight, and I rode it almost every afternoon around my neighborhood.

建議: Use correct grammar, more precise vocabulary and a linking word to improve clarity. Correct possessive/pronoun errors and the plural form. Keep it to 2–3 concise sentences with a topic sentence and one or two specific supporting details or examples.

範例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country because many children own them. For example, lots of students ride bikes to school, and others use them for recreation on weekends.

× Yes, I do.

✓ Yes, I did.

The examiner asked about possession in the past ('Did you have a bike when you were a child?'), so the student should use the past tense. Saying 'I do' is present tense and does not match the past-time question. Use 'I did' to correctly indicate past possession.

× Yes, I think bikes are popular in my country because most children's here have bikes and they either use it for fun or as a way of transportation going to school.

✓ Yes, I think bikes are popular in my country because most children here have bikes and they either use them for fun or as a way of transportation to go to school.

There are multiple issues: 'children's' is an incorrect possessive form; the plural noun should be 'children' (Grammar problem type 12). Also, 'it' is singular but refers to 'bikes' (plural), so use 'them' (also pronoun error). Finally, 'going to school' at the end is an incomplete clause following 'as a way of transportation'; better phrasing is 'to go to school'. These changes correct pronoun number agreement and improve sentence clarity. Suggestions: use 'children' not 'children's', match pronoun number ('them' for bikes), and use 'to go to school' after 'way of transportation'.