自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 回答过于简短，缺乏细节和展开。根据评分标准，应先给出主题句，然后用一两句具体细节支持，并使用连接词使表达连贯。建议在回答中说明什么时候有、是什么样的自行车、和你如何使用它（比如上学或玩耍），或讲一个简短的相关回忆以增加内容丰富度。

範例: Yes, I did. I had a small red bicycle when I was about seven, which I often rode to my friend’s house. It wasn’t very fast, but I loved practicing tricks and riding around the neighborhood every afternoon.

建議: 回答太笼统，缺乏具体理由或例子。根据评分标准，应在肯定或否定后用连接词给出至少一两个具体原因或例子（比如城市骑行文化、通勤使用、公共共享单车的普及），这样更有说服力和内容深度。

範例: Yes, I think they are. For example, many people use bikes for short commutes in cities because of traffic and bike lanes, and shared bicycles are widely available, making cycling a convenient option for daily travel.

× Yes, I did.

✓ Yes, I did.

此句为对过去时问题的简短回答，语法正确且时态与提问一致，无需修改。

× Yes, I think so.

✓ Yes, I think so.

此句为对一般现在时问题的简短回答，语法正确且时态与提问一致，无需修改。