自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 回答过于简短，未遵循“基本结构”要求。应先给出主题句并用一两句具体细节扩展，同时使用连词使表述更自然。例如说明原因、时间或一两个经历细节。注意回答不超过5句并保持自然流利。

範例: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child because my family lived in a very hilly area and my parents thought it was unsafe. However, I often wanted one and sometimes borrowed my neighbor’s bike to ride around the block.

建議: 回答简单直白但缺少支持性细节和连贯性。应先给出直接回答，然后用一到两句具体理由或例子支持观点，使用连接词（for example, because, therefore）使表达更有逻辑。保持句子数不超过5句。

範例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially in cities where traffic is heavy and cycling is more efficient. For example, many people use e-bikes for commuting, and there are dedicated bike lanes and rental services in major towns.

× No.

✓ No.

这句话是对过去时问题（Did you have a bike when you were a child?）的简短否定回答，语法正确且时态一致，因此无需修改。

× Yes.

✓ Yes.

这句话是对一般现在时问题（Do you think bikes are popular in your country?）的简短肯定回答，语法正确且时态一致，因此无需修改。