自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 回答过于简单，缺乏细节和拓展。建议用主题句直接回答后，补充原因、回忆或对比等具体细节，并使用连接词让表达更连贯。例如可以说明是否有其他代步工具、家人态度或一次难忘的骑行经历。控制在不超过5句。

範例: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child. My family couldn't afford one, so I usually walked to school or took the bus. Occasionally my older cousin let me borrow his bike, which felt exciting but also a bit scary at first. Looking back, not having a bike made me more independent in other ways.

建議: 回答过于绝对且没有支撑理由。建议先给出直接观点，然后用具体原因、比较或例子支持，并使用连接词（for example, because, however）使表达更有逻辑性。可以提到城市交通、基础设施、气候或文化因素。保持简洁，最多5句。

範例: I don't think bikes are very popular in my country, mainly because our cities lack safe bike lanes. For example, most people prefer cars or motorbikes due to long distances and heavy traffic. However, cycling is becoming more common in some neighbourhoods as people try to be healthier and save money.

× No.

✓ No, I didn't.

原句只有一个单词“No”，没有完整的句子结构。考官问的是过去是否有自行车，需要用完整的过去时句子作答。建议使用“I did”或“I didn't”来形成完整回答，并与问题时态一致。例如："No, I didn't." 或更完整的回答："No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child."

× No.

✓ No, I don't think so.

原句只有“No”，没有完整表达。考官问“Do you think bikes are popular...?” 要求对观点进行陈述，通常用现在时和完整句子回答。建议用“I don't think so.”或更完整的回答如"No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country." 这样句子完整且语气自然。