自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Your answer is direct and natural but very short and repetitive. To improve, start with a clear topic sentence, then add one or two specific supporting details (when you got it, how often you rode, or what you used it for). Use a linking word to connect ideas and avoid repeating the same verb form.

範例: Yes, I did — I had a red bicycle when I was about seven. I rode it almost every day around my neighborhood, and it was how I learned to be independent and make friends in the area.

建議: Your answer conveys the main point but contains awkward phrasing and repetition. Improve by using clearer phrasing (e.g., “popular” instead of “famous”), combining sentences with linking words, and adding a specific reason or brief example to support your opinion.

範例: Not really — bicycles aren't very popular in my country because most people prefer cars for convenience. For example, public roads and long commutes make driving more practical than cycling for daily transport.

× It's not really that famous.

✓ Bicycles are not really that popular.

The original sentence uses 'famous' which is odd for objects like bicycles in this context and 'It' is vague; this is a sentence choice/structure problem. Use 'Bicycles' as the subject to match the question about bikes and use 'popular' rather than 'famous' to convey common usage. Also choose plural to match general reference.

× We mostly use cars.

✓ We mostly use cars for transportation.

The original sentence is not incorrect grammatically but lacks the object that clarifies the comparison; adding 'for transportation' makes the meaning explicit. This addresses pronoun/reference clarity and completes the thought.

× We don't use bikes for transfer, for transportation.

✓ We don't use bikes for transportation.

'Transfer' is not the correct noun here; 'transportation' is the appropriate noun. Also repeating 'for' twice is redundant. Use the preposition 'for' + noun 'transportation' to indicate purpose. This corrects preposition and word choice errors.