自行车— Part 1 评分报告

建议: 回答直接，但时态不一致：题目问童年经历，应将“like”和“bought”统一为过去时。因果关系也可以表达得更自然，并补充一个具体细节，例如骑车的地点或用途。避免用“because”和“so”在同一句中重复连接因果。

示例: Yes, I did. I enjoyed outdoor activities as a child, so my parents bought me a bike. I often rode it around my neighborhood after school.

建议: 开头直接回答了问题，但后面的例子有明显表达错误：“the orphan by bike”无法清楚表达意思；结尾“So I think bikes”也没有说完。请用完整句说明人们何时、为何骑车，并补充明确结论。可以使用“for example”连接具体例子，但不必重复相同观点。

示例: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country. Many people ride them on weekends for exercise or to enjoy the outdoors. For example, I often see families cycling together in parks.

× Yes, I did because I like playing sports, so I bought a bike.

✓ Yes, I did because I liked playing sports, so I bought a bike.

问题询问的是你小时候的情况，回答应使用过去时。这里的“like”应改为“liked”，与“did”和“bought”的过去时保持一致。

× Yes, I did because I like playing sports, so I bought a bike.

✓ Yes, I did. I liked playing sports, so I bought a bike.

同一个句子结构中不宜同时用“because”和“so”来连接原因与结果。可以拆成两句，并用“so”连接原因和结果。

× For example, the orphan by bike on the weekend.

✓ For example, people ride bikes on the weekend.

原句缺少谓语动词，因此不是完整句子。可以补上“ride”作为谓语，使句子表达完整。

× So I think bikes

✓ So I think bikes are popular.

“I think”后面需要接一个完整的从句。原句中的“bikes”后缺少谓语，句意没有表达完整；补上“are popular”后，句子结构完整，也能回应关于自行车是否受欢迎的问题。