自行车— Part 1 评分报告

建议: Answer directly in the past tense: say “I didn’t have a bike.” Avoid the incorrect expression “I’m a poor family”; say “My family was middle-class” or “We couldn’t afford one.” You could add one specific reason or result, such as how you travelled instead. Try to speak smoothly without self-correction and fillers such as “uh.”

示例: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. My family was middle-class, and we couldn’t afford to buy one at that time. Instead, I usually walked to school or travelled by bus.

建议: Begin with the correct plural form: “Yes, bikes are very popular in my country.” Support your opinion with clear, relevant details, such as their affordability, convenience, or popularity among young people. Avoid confusing and incomplete references to individual riders or content creators, and use linking words such as “because” and “for example.”

示例: Yes, bikes are very popular in Nepal, especially among young people. They are convenient for travelling through crowded streets and are often more affordable than cars. In addition, many bike riders share travel videos online, which has made motorcycling even more popular.

× No, I don't have any bike when I'm outside because, uh, I'm a, a poor family. Uh, I mean I'm a middle class family.

✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because I came from a poor family. I mean, I came from a middle-class family.

The question asks about the student's childhood, so the answer should use the past tense. Use didn't have instead of don't have and was instead of am. The phrase came from is also appropriate for describing one's family background.

× No, I don't have any bike when I'm outside because, uh, I'm a, a poor family. Uh, I mean I'm a middle class family.

✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because I came from a poor family. I mean, I came from a middle-class family.

A person is not a family, so I'm a poor family is incorrect. Use came from a poor family or came from a middle-class family to express family background. The preposition from is needed after came.

× Yes, bike are popular in my country. There are lots of rider uh, like uh, content creator uh, Suraksha Kharka uh sees a bike rider in a uh, Nepal sees a talented girl in a rider.

✓ Yes, bikes are popular in my country. There are lots of riders, such as the content creator Suraksha Khadka, who is a talented bike rider in Nepal.

Use the plural noun bikes when speaking about bikes in general. After lots of, use the plural form riders. Remember that countable nouns usually need a plural form when referring to more than one person or thing.

× Yes, bike are popular in my country. There are lots of rider uh, like uh, content creator uh, Suraksha Kharka uh sees a bike rider in a uh, Nepal sees a talented girl in a rider.

✓ Yes, bikes are popular in my country. There are lots of riders, such as the content creator Suraksha Khadka, who is a talented bike rider in Nepal.

The plural subject bikes must take the plural verb are, so bike are must be changed to bikes are. Also, who is agrees with the singular person Suraksha Khadka. Check that each subject matches its verb in number.

× Yes, bike are popular in my country. There are lots of rider uh, like uh, content creator uh, Suraksha Kharka uh sees a bike rider in a uh, Nepal sees a talented girl in a rider.

✓ Yes, bikes are popular in my country. There are lots of riders, such as the content creator Suraksha Khadka, who is a talented bike rider in Nepal.

The original response contains incomplete and confusing clauses, including Suraksha Kharka sees a bike rider and Nepal sees a talented girl in a rider. Combine the ideas into a complete sentence with a clear subject and verb. Use such as to introduce an example and who is to add information about the person.