自行车— Part 1 评分报告

建议: 「No, I did.」は肯定と否定が矛盾しているため、「No, I didn't.」だけを使いましょう。まず結論を直接述べ、その後に理由や具体的な思い出を1文加えると、より自然で効果的です。

示例: No, I didn’t. My parents thought it was safer for me to walk or take the bus, so I never learned to ride a bike when I was young.

建议: 最初の「No」と「bikes are popular」が矛盾しているため、「Yes」または「No」を内容に合わせて選びましょう。また、「Japan has a lot of train」は不自然なので、「Japan has an extensive train system」と表現できます。「so people likely don't have a bike」ではなく、「so many people rely on trains instead of bicycles」のように、理由を明確に説明しましょう。

示例: Yes, bikes are quite popular in Japan, especially for short trips. However, because Japan has an extensive train system, many people use trains for commuting and do not cycle long distances.

× No, I did. I didn't have a bike.

✓ No, I didn't. I didn't have a bike.

The answer uses did, which gives a positive meaning, even though the intended answer is negative. Because the question asks about the past, use the negative past auxiliary didn't: No, I didn't. The second sentence is already correct.

× Japan has a lot of train so people likely don't have a bike.

✓ Japan has a lot of trains, so people likely don't have bikes.

Train must be plural after a lot of because Japan has many trains. Bike is also better in the plural when referring to bikes in general. Use a lot of + plural countable noun, such as a lot of trains or a lot of bikes.