自行车— Part 1 评分报告

建议: Ответ хороший по содержанию, но можно улучшить структуру, связность и точность языка. Сначала дайте короткий прямой ответ, затем добавьте 1–2 поддерживающих предложения с конкретикой и связующими словами. Избегайте разговорных сокращений («'cause») и повторов (две фразы про «favorite color» можно объединить). Также проверьте согласование времен и числа (например, «supported me on the back» — лучше «held the back of my bike»).

示例: Yes, I did. I loved riding my bike when I was a child; my grandfather used to hold the back of it until I learned to balance. It was a blue bike, which is why I still prefer that color today.

建议: Ответ понятен, но содержит грамматические ошибки, неточно выражённые мысли и слабая связность. Начните с короткого прямого мнения, затем приведите конкретные причины и примеры, используя связки (e.g., «however», «because», «for example»). Исправьте согласование (plural/singular) и формулировки («more popular than before» вместо «than nowadays»). Старайтесь дать 2–3 предложения максимум.

示例: I think bikes were more popular in the past, but they are less common now because many people prefer cars. For example, I rarely see children cycling in my neighborhood; mostly adults use bikes for exercise after walking.

× It was blue. It's my favorite color.

✓ It was blue. It was my favorite color.

The student switches tenses incorrectly. The context describes a childhood memory, so both sentences should be in the past tense. Using 'it's' (present) conflicts with 'was' (past). To improve, keep past tense consistently for past events: 'It was my favorite color.'

× In the past they were more popular than nowadays.

✓ In the past they were more popular than they are nowadays.

Comparison with 'nowadays' requires a present-tense clause for the current state. The original sentence omits the present verb, making the comparison incomplete. Use 'they are nowadays' to contrast past and present clearly.

× I don't see many children outside who would be riding a bike.

✓ I don't see many children outside who are riding a bike.

The modal structure 'would be riding' is inappropriate here; the speaker is describing a current habitual observation, so the present progressive 'are riding' is correct. Also 'would be' can imply conditional or hypothetical situations, which is not intended.

× I have seen only adults who likes exercises after walk.

✓ I have seen only adults who like to exercise after walking.

There is a subject-verb agreement error: 'who' refers to 'adults' (plural), so the verb should be 'like' not 'likes'. Additionally, the noun/verb forms are awkward: use the infinitive 'to exercise' and the gerund 'walking' to express 'exercise after a walk.' This produces a natural English phrasing.