Part 1
考官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
考生
Yes.
考官
Do you still like going to parks now?
考生
Yes, because box provide source of recreation time for me and there is peaceful scenario and there isn't much noise and pollution and all the commotions it's a lot of relaxing place.
考官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
考生
Yeah, because Gangtok being a pretty, uh, decent city, there needs to be, uh, well enough park for children and other peoples for tourist places. Tourist too, I guess.
考官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
考生
I would want to visit the Kaziranga National Park which is situated in our state and I would want to explore different type of wildlife, wildlife road and different kinds of birds and other things.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
分数: 40.0建议: Give a complete sentence and add brief supporting details. Say why you liked parks and mention a specific memory or activity. Keep it natural and within two to three sentences.
示例: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child because they were my favourite place to play. I especially enjoyed flying kites and playing hide-and-seek with my friends in the big grassy areas.
Do you still like going to parks now?
分数: 65.0建议: Improve grammar and clarity, replace unclear words (e.g. “box”) and use linking words to make the answer coherent. Provide one or two specific details about what you do there and how it makes you feel. Keep it within three to four sentences.
示例: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because they provide a calm place to relax away from city noise. For example, I like walking on the shaded paths and reading on a bench, which helps me de-stress after a busy day.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
分数: 60.0建议: Make your answer more structured: start with a clear opinion, then give two specific reasons and use linking words (because, moreover, for example). Avoid filler words like “uh” and be more precise about who benefits from parks.
示例: Yes, I would like to see more parks in Gangtok because they offer safe play areas for children and attractive spots for tourists. Moreover, additional parks would improve air quality and provide more outdoor spaces for local residents to exercise.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
分数: 70.0建议: Be more specific and use correct noun forms and concise phrasing. Mention particular animals or activities you want to see or do, and use a linking word to explain why. Keep to two or three sentences.
示例: I would like to visit Kaziranga National Park to see its famous one-horned rhinoceroses and many bird species. I am particularly excited about a guided safari to observe wildlife up close and to learn about conservation efforts there.
× Yes, because box provide source of recreation time for me and there is peaceful scenario and there isn't much noise and pollution and all the commotions it's a lot of relaxing place.
✓ Yes, because parks provide a source of recreation for me, there is a peaceful atmosphere, there isn't much noise or pollution or commotion, and it is a very relaxing place.
Multiple plural and noun form errors: 'box' should be plural 'parks' to match meaning (singular/plural issue). 'Provide' must agree with plural subject 'parks' so remains 'provide' (subject-verb agreement is covered by item 1/27 but primary issue is plural noun). 'Source of recreation time' is awkward; correct to 'a source of recreation' (article and noun form). 'Scenario' is incorrect collocation; use 'atmosphere'. 'All the commotions' should be singular 'commotion' or uncountable; changed to 'commotion'. Also split run-on clauses and replace 'it's' with 'it is' for formality and clarity. Suggestion: choose correct singular/plural nouns and standard collocations (peaceful atmosphere, source of recreation).
× Yeah, because Gangtok being a pretty, uh, decent city, there needs to be, uh, well enough park for children and other peoples for tourist places.
✓ Yes, because Gangtok is a pretty decent city, there need to be enough parks for children and other people and for tourists.
Errors: 'there needs to be' should agree with plural noun 'parks' so use 'there need to be' (subject-verb agreement tied to quantifier). 'Well enough park' is incorrect order and choice; correct form is 'enough parks' (quantifier placement). 'Other peoples' is incorrect plural of 'people' (use 'other people'). 'For tourist places' is unclear; corrected to 'for tourists'. Suggestions: use 'there needs/need to be' according to the noun that follows, place quantifier before noun ('enough parks'), and use 'people' not 'peoples' when referring to persons.
× Tourist too, I guess.
✓ Tourists too, I guess.
'Tourist' as a singular noun is incorrect in context; plural 'tourists' is appropriate. This is a third person singular/plural number issue: using singular where plural is intended. Suggestion: use plural form 'tourists' when referring to people in general.
× I would want to visit the Kaziranga National Park which is situated in our state and I would want to explore different type of wildlife, wildlife road and different kinds of birds and other things.
✓ I would like to visit Kaziranga National Park, which is in our state, and I would like to explore different types of wildlife, wildlife habitats, different kinds of birds, and other things.
Issues: 'would want to' is acceptable but 'would like to' is more natural (modal preference). 'Different type of wildlife' needs plural 'types' for agreement (singular/plural issue) and 'wildlife road' is incorrect collocation; likely 'wildlife habitats' or 'wildlife areas'. The list needed parallel structure and correct nouns. Suggestion: use parallel noun forms and correct collocations (types of wildlife, habitats).