Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: 回答直接、语法准确，也能清楚回应问题。不过答案过于简短，缺少原因或相关细节。可以在否定回答后补充一句原因，例如说明当时更常使用什么交通工具，或解释为什么没有自行车。

Ví dụ: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. My parents usually drove me to school because it was quite far from our home.

Gợi ý: 回答有明确观点、原因和例子，结构基本完整，也使用了“because”和“For example”来连接细节。但是“good for short cheap”明显是重复和表达错误，应该改为“good for short trips”。此外，可以使用更自然的表达，如“beat the traffic”或“avoid traffic jams”，并减少句子中的重复，使答案更流畅。

Ví dụ: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country because they are affordable and convenient for short trips. They are also a good way to avoid traffic jams, especially in busy cities. For example, many students and office workers cycle to school or work in the city center.

× Well, I see bikes are quite popular in my country because they are cheap and good for short cheap and many people use them to avoid traffic.

✓ Well, I think bikes are quite popular in my country because they are cheap and good for short trips, and many people use them to avoid traffic.

“good for short cheap”结构不完整，且“cheap”在这里不能作名词使用。表达“短途出行”时，应使用名词短语“short trips”。另外，在两个完整分句之间加逗号和连词“and”，可以使句子结构更清晰。语法问题类型ID为26。