Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Відповідь була граматично правильною та природною, але занадто короткою. Додайте коротке пояснення чи деталь (наприклад коли ви її отримали, який вона була чи як часто ви на ній їздили) у 1–2 реченнях, використовуючи звʼязки (e.g., "I got it when...", "I used to..."). Це зробить відповідь більш інформативною й природною.

Ví dụ: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I got it as a birthday present when I was seven, and I used to ride it to the park every weekend with my friends.

Gợi ý: Ідея слушна, але формулювання не зовсім природне і є зайві слова («I think yes», «I guess that it is a big problem because we should use bikes»). Розбийте думку на чіткі речення: дайте прямий висновок, потім пояснення та приклад. Використовуйте звʼязки (e.g., "However", "because", "for example") і конкретизуйте причину проблеми та можливе рішення.

Ví dụ: Yes, bikes are popular mainly among children, but not so much among adults. However, this is worrying because cycling would reduce traffic and pollution; for example, if more adults commuted by bike, cities would be less congested and air quality could improve.

× I think yes, but they are popular among children, not among adults, and I guess that it is a big problem because we should use bikes.

✓ I think so, but bikes are popular among children rather than adults, and I guess this is a big problem because we should use bikes more.

The sentence contains multiple issues: 'I think yes' is unnatural; use 'I think so'. 'They are popular among children, not among adults' is grammatically acceptable but word order and cohesion improve with 'bikes are popular among children rather than adults'. 'I guess that it is a big problem' is wordy; 'this is a big problem' is clearer. Also missing word 'more' after 'use bikes' to express increased usage. Overall these are sentence structure and style problems; suggestions: use natural collocations ('I think so'), combine clauses for clarity, and include necessary adverbs (e.g., 'more') to convey intended meaning.