Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Ваш ответ понятен, но неестественен и неструктурирован. Вы дали факты, но предложение получилось запутанным и неполным: нет чёткого топик‑предложения и связки между идеями. Чтобы улучшить оценку, сформулируйте одно ясное предложение в начале (топик), затем добавьте одну‑две поддерживающие детали с использованием связующих слов (for example, later, because). Обратите внимание на времена и последовательность (first, then). Попрактикуйтесь в сокращённых, чётких ответах до 3‑4 предложений и избегайте лишних пауз и повторов.

Ví dụ: Yes. I had my first bike when I was three years old. Later, when I was ten, I got a different, bigger bike because I had grown taller and wanted to ride longer distances. For example, I used the second bike to cycle to friends’ houses in the neighborhood.

Gợi ý: Ответ неясный и содержит много пауз и повторов. Вы начинаете с мнения, но затем не развиваете аргументацию и не даёте конкретных примеров. Чтобы улучшить, выразите мнение кратко, затем приведите 1–2 конкретные причины или примера, используя связки (because, however, for example). Уберите заполнители («uh», «we choose, we choose») и произносите более связно. Практикуйте ответы, где каждое предложение логически следует из предыдущего.

Ví dụ: I wouldn’t say bikes are very popular nationwide because many people prefer cars or public transport. However, in some cities like Mukashi, bikes are quite common because the streets are narrow and inexpensive to maintain; for example, many students and workers cycle to save money and avoid traffic.

× Yeah, I had a bike when I was three years old and I had the second bike when I was 10 years old and there was different.

✓ Yeah, I had a bike when I was three years old, and I got my second bike when I was ten years old; it was different.

The student misuses past-tense verbs and an impersonal phrase. Use 'got' or 'received' for acquiring something in the past (past tense), and use 'it was different' to refer clearly to the second bike. Also add commas or a semicolon to separate ideas for clarity. Suggestions: replace the second 'had' with 'got', write numbers consistently as words for small numbers, and use 'it was different' to describe the second bike.

× I will say no because I in each city we have, uh, differences choices, uh, and uh, I think in my city in Mukashi, we have, uh, we choose, we choose bikes because.

✓ I would say no, because in each city we have different choices, and I think in my city, Mukashi, people choose bikes.

The original uses 'I will say' which is awkward for expressing opinion; 'I would say' or 'I don't think so' fits better. Word order and articles are incorrect: 'differences choices' should be 'different choices'. Remove filler words and redundant repetition 'we choose, we choose'. Use 'people choose bikes' or 'many people choose bikes' to make the subject clear. Maintain present simple for general truths (people choose).