Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Make your response more grammatically correct, concise and logically ordered. Start with a clear topic sentence in past tense, give one or two specific supporting details (who bought it, how you used it), use linking words (for example, because, so) and avoid repetition. Keep it within 2–4 sentences.

Ví dụ: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. My father bought it for me, and I used it to cycle to school and then to my tuition classes, so it was very convenient and saved time.

Gợi ý: Organize your answer with a clear opinion, then give two specific reasons using linking words. Correct grammar (use plural/singular correctly) and avoid filler words. Mention examples or comparisons briefly to make it more specific.

Ví dụ: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country. They are inexpensive, so many middle-income families can afford them, and they are a convenient and reliable way to travel short distances within the city compared with cars, which are more costly and less practical in heavy traffic.

× Yes, I have a bike.

✓ Yes, I had a bike.

The examiner asked about possession in the past ('when you were a child'), so the past simple should be used. 'Have' is present tense; change to 'had' to match the time frame. Suggestion: Use past simple for past situations (I had, I went, I lived).

× When I was a child my father purchased for me and then it's all then throw my bike.

✓ When I was a child my father bought one for me, but later someone threw away my bike.

Multiple issues: 'purchased for me' is awkward — use 'bought one for me'; 'it's all then throw my bike' is ungrammatical and unclear. Also tense and subject are inconsistent. Use a clear past narrative: 'bought one for me' and 'someone threw away my bike.' Suggestion: Keep actions in past simple and use clear subjects (someone/them) for events.

× I I went to my school then come to home, then I will go to my tuition.

✓ I went to school and then came home, and after that I went to my tuition class.

Mixed tenses: 'went' (past) is correct, but 'come' is present and 'will go' is future. All events refer to past routine, so use past simple for each verb: 'came' and 'went.' Suggestion: Keep sequence of past actions in past simple (I went, I came, I went).

× So it's very easy, convenient for me that time.

✓ So it was very easy and convenient for me at that time.

Tense mismatch: 'it's' is present while context is past; use 'it was.' Also combine adjectives with 'and' and use the prepositional phrase 'at that time.' Suggestion: Match tense to context and join adjectives appropriately.

× Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because it's not much expensive so every middle family can afford it and it is a easy it is a reliable source for travelling in a within a city rather than we have a car who also have high

✓ Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because they are not very expensive, so every middle-class family can afford them. They are an easy and reliable way to travel within a city, especially compared with cars, which are more expensive.

Multiple errors: pronoun and number agreement ('it's' referring to bikes should be 'they are'); incorrect quantifier 'not much expensive' -> 'not very expensive'; 'every middle family' -> 'every middle-class family'; plural consistency for 'them'; 'a easy' -> 'an easy'; 'travelling in a within a city' -> 'travel within a city'; sentence fragment at end 'we have a car who also have high' -> clarify comparison: 'cars, which are more expensive.' Suggestion: Ensure subject-verb agreement, correct quantifiers, use 'middle-class,' use 'an' before vowel sounds, and complete comparisons with clear clauses.