Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Ответ не совсем по теме (говорит про роликовые коньки, а не про велосипед), грамматика и порядок слов нарушены, структура ответа недостаточно ясная. Совет: сначала прямо ответьте на вопрос (да/нет + короткое уточнение), затем добавьте 1–2 предложения с конкретными деталями (кто, где, когда, почему), используя связки (for example, when, because, and). Следите за временем глаголов и порядком слов. Например: "Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I often rode it with my friend in the evenings to the park because it was fun and helped us exercise."

Ví dụ: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I often rode it with my friend in the evenings to the park because we enjoyed exploring the neighborhood and getting some exercise. For example, we would cycle for about an hour after dinner most days.

Gợi ý: Ответ понятен, но не очень связный и содержит повторения ("bike" и "drive a lot of bike"). Не хватает конкретных примеров и связок. Совет: начните с прямого мнения, затем объясните причину и приведите конкретный пример или результат. Используйте связки (because, for example, therefore). Избегайте повторов, используйте синонимы (bicycles, cyclists, couriers).

Ví dụ: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country because they are cheap and convenient for short trips. For example, many couriers and food-delivery workers use bicycles to move quickly through traffic, so cycling is common in cities.

× Actually we with my friend in the evening we go to the walk and just skip our roll skates so.

✓ Actually, my friend and I used to go for walks in the evening and just skip our roller skates.

The original sentence has multiple issues: incorrect word order, wrong verb forms and unnatural phrasing. 'We with my friend' should be 'my friend and I' (correct pronoun order). 'Go to the walk' is incorrect; use 'go for walks' or 'go on walks.' The phrase 'just skip our roll skates' is unclear — 'skip' is the wrong verb and 'roll skates' should be 'roller skates.' Also the student is talking about a habitual past action, so 'used to' is appropriate to indicate past habitual activity. Suggestion: use natural subject order ('my friend and I'), correct collocation ('go for walks'), correct noun form ('roller skates') and appropriate past habitual construction ('used to').

× Yeah, in my childhood I had a roller skate that I really love.

✓ Yeah, in my childhood I had roller skates that I really loved.

'A roller skate' is singular but the meaning implies a pair or multiple skates, so plural 'roller skates' is more natural (singular would be 'a pair of roller skates'). Also the sentence refers to the past, so the verb should be in past tense: 'loved' instead of 'love'. Suggestion: use correct plurality for items worn in pairs and match verb tense to the time reference.

× Actually, yeah, in our country we have a lot of bikes and people who bike, who drive a lot of bike, because with bike people can work with delivery and also.

✓ Actually, yes, in our country we have a lot of bicycles and many people ride them because they can work as delivery couriers with a bike.

Multiple problems: 'bikes' is fine but 'drive a lot of bike' is ungrammatical—people 'ride' bikes, not 'drive' them. 'A lot of bike' has number agreement issues; use plural or 'many bikes.' 'With bike people can work with delivery' is awkward; a clearer structure is 'they can work as delivery couriers with a bike' or 'they can do delivery work using a bike.' Also 'yeah' is informal; 'yes' is more appropriate in a test. Suggestion: use 'ride' for bicycles, ensure subject-verb agreement and plural forms, and rephrase for clarity and natural collocation.