Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Be more natural and accurate, avoid filler words and odd phrases, and provide clearer, specific details. Begin with a concise topic sentence, then add one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Correct mistakes (e.g., “UMM” and “watching the fish fall on my bike” is unclear). Keep answer to no more than five sentences.

Ví dụ: Yes, I did. I had a red bicycle and I used to ride it almost every day around my neighborhood. For example, I often cycled to the nearby park and went around a pond where many carp swam, which I enjoyed watching as I rode. Those rides made me feel free and helped me stay active.

Gợi ý: Answer directly and use clearer linking words; avoid hesitations like “umm.” Provide specific reasons and an example or brief comparison. Use precise vocabulary (e.g., “cost-effective,” “bike-sharing schemes”) and limit to three to four sentences.

Ví dụ: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country. For instance, many cities have bike-sharing schemes and dedicated cycle paths in parks, which encourage people to ride. Moreover, cycling is a cost-effective way to commute short distances and helps avoid traffic congestion.

× I really liked UMM cycling everywhere with my bike and I also liked to go to the park and go cycling around it.

✓ I really liked cycling everywhere with my bike, and I also liked going to the park and cycling around it.

The sentence mixes 'liked' with an infinitive ('to go') and a gerund ('cycling') causing inconsistency. After 'liked,' using the gerund form (verb + -ing) is more natural for habitual actions: 'liked cycling' and 'liked going.' Also remove the filler 'UMM' and redundant 'go' before 'cycling.' Improve flow by adding a comma before 'and.'

× There was a pond with many fish there and I loved cycling around the pond watching the fish fall on my bike.

✓ There was a pond with many fish, and I loved cycling around the pond, watching the fish swim near my bike.

The original 'watching the fish fall on my bike' is illogical and likely a wrong choice of verb. Use a comma to separate the clauses. 'Fall on my bike' is incorrect for fish in a pond; 'swim near my bike' or 'swim close to the surface' fits the intended meaning. Also add a comma before the participial phrase for clarity.

× I believe bikes would be pretty popular in my country since I see a lot of bikes around for rent and there is also a lot of parks for umm the use of bikes.

✓ I believe bikes are quite popular in my country, since I see a lot of bikes for rent and there are also many parks for bike use.

Using 'would be' here weakens a present observation; use present tense 'are' because the speaker refers to current facts. 'A lot of parks' should be 'many parks' (quantifier choice) and 'there is' must agree with plural 'parks' (use 'there are'). Remove filler 'umm' and rephrase 'for the use of bikes' to 'for bike use' for naturalness.

× It is also a cheaper type of transportation for people and it would be helpful in commuting without using up too much money.

✓ It is also a cheaper form of transportation for people, and it helps with commuting without costing too much.

'A cheaper type of transportation' is wordy; 'a cheaper form of transportation' is more natural. The second clause uses 'would be' unnecessarily; use present 'helps' to match the general truth. 'Using up too much money' is awkward; 'costing too much' is clearer and idiomatic.