Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Make the response more natural and structured: start with a clear topic sentence, give one or two specific supporting reasons, and use linking words. Avoid repetition and grammatical mistakes (e.g., "when I was a child"). Keep to under five sentences.

Ví dụ: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. At that time I wasn’t interested in cycling, and my parents also thought bikes were too expensive for our family budget. As a result, I learned to get around mostly by walking or using public transport.

Gợi ý: Provide a fuller, more natural answer: begin with a clear opinion, then give specific reasons and a brief example or contrast. Avoid short dismissive endings like "that's it." Use linking words (e.g., "because", "however", "for example").

Ví dụ: I don’t think bikes are very popular in my country because the climate is usually very hot, which makes cycling uncomfortable. In addition, many people prefer motorbikes or cars for convenience. For example, during the summer months most streets are crowded with scooters rather than bicycles.

× No, I didn't have a bike when I was child because I didn't like riding a bike and it was too expensive.

✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because I didn't like riding a bike and it was too expensive.

The error is a missing article before the singular noun 'child'. Use the indefinite article 'a' with singular, countable nouns in this context. Suggestion: always include 'a' or 'the' as needed (here 'a child').

× No, bikes are not popular in my country because in my country it is very hot and that's it.

✓ No, bikes are not popular in my country because it is very hot here.

The original sentence is wordy and ends with the informal filler 'and that's it', which is inappropriate in a formal answer. Also the phrase 'in my country' is repeated unnecessarily. Suggestion: simplify the sentence by removing repetition and informal fillers; use 'here' for locality and keep the causal clause concise.