Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Your response simply repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. For a higher score, answer directly with a clear topic sentence (yes/no or brief statement), then give one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Keep it natural and within 3–4 sentences.

Ví dụ: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. It was a small red bicycle with training wheels that my parents bought me for my sixth birthday. Because I lived near a park, I used to ride it there almost every day and gradually learned to ride without the training wheels.

Gợi ý: Again, you repeated the examiner rather than providing an opinion. To improve, state your opinion clearly, then support it with specific reasons or examples using linking words (for example, because, therefore). Limit to 3–4 sentences and use relevant vocabulary like commute, cycling infrastructure, or recreational.

Ví dụ: Yes, I think bikes are fairly popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and exercise. For example, cities have dedicated bike lanes and bike-sharing schemes, so commuters often cycle to work. However, car travel is still common for longer journeys, so cycling is mostly popular in urban areas.

× Did you have a bike when you were a child?

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

The student's original reply repeated the question instead of answering; this is a sentence structure error (ID 26). The response should be a declarative sentence answering the past-tense yes/no question. Use past simple 'had' to match 'Did you have' and include a subject ('I') and auxiliary if needed. Suggestion: Form a complete sentence that directly answers the question, e.g. 'Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.' or 'No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child.' '},{