Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: 答案太简短，缺乏信息量。应先用完整句直接回答，然后补充具体细节（例如原因、年龄、是否骑过其他交通工具或对骑自行车的记忆），并使用连接词使表达更自然。控制在最多5句内。

Ví dụ: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child. My parents thought it was unsafe for me to ride on busy roads, so I usually walked to school or took the bus. Sometimes I borrowed my cousin's bike on weekends, but I never owned one myself.

Gợi ý: 回答不完整且含糊。应先直接给出明确立场，然后用一到两句原因或例子支持观点，使用连接词（however, because, for example）来衔接。避免口语化的停顿词并扩展内容到2-4句。

Ví dụ: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially in smaller cities and among students. However, their use depends on infrastructure; for example, in large cities people prefer cars or public transport because bike lanes are limited.

× No.

✓ No, I didn't.

学生回答缺少谓语和主语，从而句子不完整。面试官问的是过去是否有自行车，正确的简短否定回答应使用助动词 did（过去时）+ not 或缩写 didn’t，并包含主语 I。改进建议：在回答过去的yes/no问题时使用完整的主语和助动词，或使用简短回答格式 “No, I didn't.” 或 “No, I didn't have one.”

× Yeah, but.

✓ Yes, they are popular, but not everywhere.

原句“Yeah, but.” 是不完整的回应，缺少对“but”后面转折内容的补充。面试官问现在或一般情况下自行车是否流行，应使用完整句子并与主语和谓语一致（they are）以及补充转折信息。改进建议：避免使用仅有连词的残句，若使用 but 必须补充完整信息，例如 “Yes, they are popular, but not in my city.” 或更简洁的 “Yes, they are popular.”