Parks— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Your answer is too short and does not respond directly. Give a clear opinion (yes/no) with a brief reason and one specific detail to make it natural and informative. Keep it within 1–4 sentences and use a linking word if you add a reason.

Ví dụ: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child because they had wide green fields and a playground. For example, I used to spend hours on the swings and play football with my neighbors, which helped me make friends.

Gợi ý: Again, you should state a clear position and support it with a short explanation. Mention a current activity you enjoy there and use a linking word to connect ideas (for example, 'because' or 'so').

Ví dụ: Yes, I still enjoy going to parks because they are peaceful and great for exercise. For instance, I go jogging there twice a week and I often read on a bench afterwards.

Gợi ý: Answer the question directly and give a reason with a specific benefit of more parks (e.g. health, environment, community). Use a linking word to make the answer coherent.

Ví dụ: Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city because they improve air quality and provide spaces for families. In particular, more small neighborhood parks would make it easier for people to relax without traveling far.

Gợi ý: Provide a clear yes/no answer and name a specific park or type of park you want to visit, plus a reason and a short detail about what you would do there. Use a linking phrase like 'for example' or 'such as'.

Ví dụ: Yes, I would like to visit the botanical garden next month because it has rare plants and guided tours. For example, I plan to join a photography walk there to practice taking pictures of flowers.

× I don't know

✓ I don't know.

The student's reply is grammatically correct but lacks completeness and suitability for the conversational context. This falls under sentence structure errors because the answer is a minimal fragment that does not fully address the question. Suggestion: provide a complete, context-appropriate response such as 'Yes, I liked going to parks when I was a child' or 'No, I didn't go to parks often as a child.' This gives a clear stance and supports follow-up questions. Note: punctuation (a period) is added for correctness.

× I don't know

✓ I don't know.

Same as above. The reply is grammatically correct but not adequate for the question 'Do you still like going to parks now?' Provide a clearer, complete response like 'Yes, I still enjoy going to parks' or 'No, I rarely go to parks now.' This improves communication and fits the present-tense question.

× I don't know

✓ I don't know.

Same issue for the question 'Would you like to see more parks in your city?' The short reply is not informative. Better responses include 'Yes, I would like to see more parks in my city' or 'No, I think there are enough parks.' These full sentences match the conditional modal 'would like' and clarify the student's position.

× I don't know

✓ I don't know.

For the future-oriented question 'Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?' the student's answer is again minimal. A full, context-appropriate answer would be 'Yes, I want to visit the central park next year' or 'No, I don't have any specific parks in mind.' This uses future intention and gives the examiner something to follow up on.