Parks— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Be direct, concise and grammatical. Start with a clear topic sentence answering the question, then add 1–2 specific supporting details in full sentences. Use correct tense and simple connectors (for example, "because," "so"). Avoid irrelevant words like "Secondly" unless you have a first point.

Ví dụ: Yes, I liked going to parks as a child because there was one just near my home and close to my school. I usually went there on Saturdays with my friends or family to play football and have picnics.

Gợi ý: Give a clear statement about your current habit using correct tense. If your routine changed, explain briefly why with a linking word (e.g., "but", "however"). Keep to 2–3 simple sentences and avoid unclear phrases like "big heart" or "can go with the park every day."

Ví dụ: I used to visit parks often during holidays, but now I am busier with work and cannot go every day. I still enjoy going when I have free time because it helps me relax.

Gợi ý: Answer clearly and give precise reasons. Use relevant vocabulary (health, community, recreation) and logical linking words ("because", "so"). Avoid unrelated or confusing words (e.g., "Fox", "on TV", "growth in years"). Limit to 2–3 sentences focused on benefits of more parks.

Ví dụ: Yes, I would like more parks in my city because they provide green space for exercise and relaxation. More parks would improve public health and give families safe places to spend time outdoors.

Gợi ý: Give a direct answer and then explain briefly. If you have no specific park in mind, say so and describe the kind of park you would like to visit (features such as a lake, playground or trails). Use standard vocabulary ("I don’t have a particular park") and avoid fillers like "well, exactly."

Ví dụ: I don't have a particular park in mind to visit, but I prefer parks with a lake, open grassland and walking paths. I would like to visit a park like that in the future for relaxing walks and birdwatching.

× Secondly, yes, because when I was a child there was a park just near my home and was not far away from my school so I usually go there on Saturdays if I'm friends or families.

✓ Yes, because when I was a child there was a park just near my home and it was not far from my school, so I usually went there on Saturdays with my friends or family.

Multiple present/past tense inconsistencies and missing subject: 'when I was a child' sets past context, so verbs should be past tense (went, was). Also add the missing subject 'it' before 'was not far'. Use 'friends or family' (family as uncountable) and 'with' to indicate accompaniment. Replace 'if I'm' with 'with' to correct meaning.

× Previous on I was what I like to do on holidays but when I got busier I can go with the park every day. Now there is a big heart for me.

✓ Before, going to the park was something I liked to do on holidays, but when I got busier I could not go to the park every day. Now parks are very important to me.

Tense and modality errors: 'Previous on' is incorrect expression; use 'Before'. 'I was what I like to do' is ungrammatical—use 'was something I liked'. 'I can go with the park every day' mixes tenses and prepositions; past ability should be 'could not go', and 'to the park' is correct preposition. 'There is a big heart for me' is an incorrect metaphor; replace with 'parks are very important to me' for clarity.

× Obviously, yes, because I think parks can bring us growth in years and I was relaxed more and more. People now don't like to go out and play and I think that Fox can get healthier and university. So I would like to see more parks on TV.

✓ Obviously. I think parks help us grow over the years and help us relax more and more. People now don't like to go out and play, and I think parks can make people healthier and more connected to the community. So I would like to see more parks in the city.

Pronoun and noun errors: 'bring us growth in years' is awkward; 'help us grow over the years' is clearer. 'I was relaxed' mixes past tense and meaning; use present 'help us relax'. 'Fox' is a mistaken noun—likely meant 'folks' or 'people'; corrected to 'people'. 'Get healthier and university' is incoherent; corrected to 'healthier and more connected to the community'. 'Parks on TV' is wrong preposition and context; 'in the city' fits the question about more parks in the city.

× Well, exactly, that's not the exact park that I wanna go to 'cause I think that's good. Parks are the same, like I mean with the lake from grassland and some branches. So I don't have a park that is specially for me to visit.

✓ Well, not exactly. There isn't a specific park that I want to visit because I think many parks are similar. Parks often have a lake, grassland, and trees. So I don't have a park that is special for me to visit.

Sentence structure and informal contractions: 'that's not the exact park that I wanna go to' is informal and unclear; use 'not exactly' and 'specific park that I want to visit'. 'Like I mean with the lake from grassland and some branches' is ungrammatical—clarify as 'often have a lake, grassland, and trees'. 'Specially for me' should be 'special for me'. Avoid slang 'wanna' and casual 'cause' in formal responses.