Parks— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Be more fluent and concise. Start with a clear topic sentence, avoid hesitations like "umm", and give one specific reason with a brief example. Keep to under 5 sentences and use a linking word to connect reason and example.

Ví dụ: Not really. I rarely enjoyed going to parks as a child because I found walks repetitive and unstimulating. For example, my local park had only a small playground and no activities, so I preferred staying home and reading instead.

Gợi ý: Answer directly, avoid repetition, and correct grammar. Replace vague or unclear phrases ("particulate matter to part 5") with clear reasons. Use one linking word and one supporting detail about alternatives you prefer.

Ví dụ: Not really. I avoid parks now because the city parks near me are often polluted, with visible dust and traffic fumes. Therefore, I prefer going to shopping malls where the air feels cleaner and there are more things to do.

Gợi ý: Give a clear opinion and support it with specific reasons. Fix grammar (e.g., "I wouldn't" is vague — say "I wouldn't mind" or "I wouldn't like that"). If recommending government action, state exactly what measures you mean and why. Use a linking word to show contrast or reason.

Ví dụ: I wouldn't actually support more parks in the city because I believe resources should go to improving public transport and reducing pollution. However, if parks are added, the government should implement strict maintenance and anti-littering rules to keep them clean and safe.

Gợi ý: Be specific about the type of park and explain why you want to visit it. Avoid vague phrases like "a lot of something special." Use a clear example and one reason, linked by a word such as "because" or "for example."

Ví dụ: Yes. I would like to visit a themed park, for example an astronaut-themed park, because it would offer interactive exhibits about space and make learning fun. Such a park would be both entertaining and educational.

× Personally, I didn't like going to the park because umm, at the time I felt bored when I had to go for a walk at the park.

✓ Personally, I didn't like going to parks because, at the time, I felt bored when I had to go for walks in the park.

The sentence uses past tense correctly but has issues with singular/plural and article use which relate to consistency with past habitual actions. Change 'the park' to 'parks' and 'a walk at the park' to 'walks in the park' to match the general habit of going to parks as a child and to use the correct preposition ('in' for park) and plural for habitual activities. Also remove filler 'umm' and add commas for clarity. Grammar problem type ID:5

× No, I don't. I dislike going to the park. I think, umm, there's a lot of pollution, especially the particulate matter to part 5 in the city center.

✓ No, I don't. I dislike going to parks. I think there is a lot of pollution in the city center, especially particulate matter.

Original mixes singular/plural and has awkward phrase 'to part 5'. Use plural 'parks' when speaking generally and correct preposition 'in the city center'. Remove filler 'umm' and redundant 'the' before 'particulate matter'. This keeps present tense and general statement form. Grammar problem type ID:6

× I really love go for work or having window shopping in the mall.

✓ I really love going to work or window shopping in the mall.

After 'love' use the gerund form 'going' not the base verb 'go'. Use 'going to work' and 'window shopping' (gerund) without 'having'. Also use correct preposition 'to the mall' or 'in the mall' depending on emphasis; here 'in the mall' is acceptable. Grammar problem type ID:8

× I wouldn't personally. For me, I don't agree that parks are important for the city, but I encourage the government should have the strong or the strict.

✓ I personally wouldn't. I don't think parks are important for the city, but I think the government should have strong or strict regulations.

Sentence had incorrect modal structure 'encourage the government should'. Use 'the government should' or 'I encourage the government to have', not both. 'Should have the strong or the strict' is ungrammatical; use 'strong or strict regulations' to complete the idea. Adjust word order: 'I personally wouldn't' sounds more natural. Grammar problem type ID:4

× I would like to see the parks where it would be a lot of something special or the astronaut theme or something new.

✓ I would like to see parks that have something special, like an astronaut theme or other new attractions.

Original misuses 'it would be a lot of something special' and repeats modal 'would' unnecessarily. Use relative clause 'parks that have' and simple present 'have' to describe future desired features. Clarify examples: 'like an astronaut theme or other new attractions.' This keeps the polite conditional 'I would like'. Grammar problem type ID:7