Bike— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: Answer directly using the past tense: “Yes, I did.” Avoid repeating “bike” and connecting many ideas with “and.” Use “rode” rather than “drove” for a bike, and add one clear, relevant detail about where you rode it or how you felt. Aim for two or three concise sentences.

Exemplo: Yes, I had a pink bike when I was a child. It had gears, and I often rode it with my friends around our neighborhood. Later, I gave it to my younger sister.

Sugestão: Start with a clear answer, such as “Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country.” The phrases “lower middle class and thinking class” and “commute to the shorter durations” are unclear; use “people on modest incomes” and “short distances” instead. Organize your reasons with a linking phrase, and finish the incomplete thought. Focus on affordability, convenience, or ease of parking.

Exemplo: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially in crowded cities. They are affordable and convenient for short journeys, and they are much easier to park than cars. As a result, many people use them for commuting.

× Certainly yes, I do have a bike when I was a child.

✓ Certainly, yes. I had a bike when I was a child.

The question asks about a past period, indicated by when you were a child, so use the past-tense verb had rather than the present-tense phrase do have. Use did have only for emphasis, as in I certainly did have a bike.

× I ride it daily with my friends.

✓ I rode it daily with my friends.

This describes what you did as a child, so the verb should be in the past tense. The past tense of ride is rode.

× Apart from this, it is also a convenient way to commute to the shorter durations.

✓ Apart from this, it is also a convenient way to commute over short distances.

To the shorter durations is not an appropriate prepositional phrase for describing travel. Use over short distances when referring to the length of a journey. If you mean the length of time, you could say for short journeys.

× It is very convenient for the parking at the crowded places.

✓ It is very convenient for parking in crowded places.

Use for parking to describe the activity, without the before the gerund. Use in rather than at when referring generally to parking within crowded places.

× It is very convenient for the parking at the crowded places.

✓ It is very convenient for parking in crowded places.

The definite article the is unnecessary because parking and crowded places are being discussed generally, not as specific parking or places. Use parking and crowded places without the.

× I think it's easier for the people.

✓ I think it's easier for people.

When people refers to people in general, do not use the definite article. Use the people only when referring to a particular, identifiable group.