Bike— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: Ответ в целом прямой, но есть грамматические и лексические ошибки: вместо “in my childhood” естественнее сказать “when I was a child”; “we lived in a street” лучше заменить на “we lived on a street”; “bad road condition” — на “poor road conditions”. Фраза “have a ride to ride a bike” избыточна и неестественна — достаточно “ride a bike”. Используйте простую структуру: прямой ответ → причина → возможное следствие. Например, объясните, что из-за плохих дорог кататься было небезопасно.

Exemplo: No, unfortunately, I didn’t. When I was a child, we lived on a street with very poor road conditions, so it wasn’t safe or convenient to ride a bike. That’s why I usually played indoors instead.

Sugestão: Основная идея понятна, но ответ содержит много грамматических ошибок и заканчивается незавершённой фразой. Исправьте “we are a developing country” на “we are a developing country” только если речь идёт о стране; естественнее: “Although my country is still developing...”. Конструкцию “we our conditions of roads are don't offer good conditions” нужно заменить на “the roads are not very bike-friendly”. Используйте “on our roads”, а не “in our roads”, и “people tend to drive cars rather than ride bikes”, а не “used to drive cars more than bikes”. Добавьте конкретную причину или сравнение, например отсутствие велосипедных дорожек и опасность движения.

Exemplo: Not really. Although cycling is becoming more popular, many people still prefer cars because our roads are not very bike-friendly and there are few dedicated cycle lanes. As a result, riding a bike can be quite dangerous, especially in busy cities.

× Unfortunately no because in my childhood we lived in a street where there was bad road condition and it was hard to have a ride to ride a bike.

✓ Unfortunately, no, because in my childhood we lived on a street where the road conditions were poor, and it was hard to ride a bike.

Road conditions is plural because the sentence refers generally to the state of the roads. Therefore, the plural verb were is used instead of was. Also, ride a bike is the correct verb phrase; have a ride to ride a bike is unnecessarily repetitive.

× Unfortunately no because in my childhood we lived in a street where there was bad road condition and it was hard to have a ride to ride a bike.

✓ Unfortunately, no, because in my childhood we lived on a street where the road conditions were poor, and it was hard to ride a bike.

Use on, rather than in, when referring to a street where someone lives: live on a street. Use in for larger areas such as a city, country, or neighborhood.

× Unfortunately no because in my childhood we lived in a street where there was bad road condition and it was hard to have a ride to ride a bike.

✓ Unfortunately, no, because in my childhood we lived on a street where the road conditions were poor, and it was hard to ride a bike.

The phrase have a ride to ride a bike has an unnecessarily repeated structure. After it was hard, use the infinitive directly: it was hard to ride a bike. Use commas to separate the introductory answer and the longer reason clause.

× Not really, because we are a developing country and we our conditions of roads are don't offer good conditions for bikers.

✓ Not really, because our country is developing, and the road conditions here do not make cycling safe.

We and our cannot be placed together before the same noun phrase. Use our country when referring to the country, and use the possessive form our before a noun such as our road conditions.

× Not really, because we are a developing country and we our conditions of roads are don't offer good conditions for bikers.

✓ Not really, because our country is developing, and the road conditions here do not make cycling safe.

The present-tense auxiliary are cannot be used together with the present-tense auxiliary do in are do not offer. Use either are plus an adjective, such as are unsafe, or do not plus the base verb. Here, do not make is the correct present-tense structure.

× Not really, because we are a developing country and we our conditions of roads are don't offer good conditions for bikers.

✓ Not really, because our country is developing, and the road conditions here do not make cycling safe.

The original sentence incorrectly combines the subject we with the noun phrase our conditions of roads. The subject should be clearly expressed as the road conditions, which takes the plural auxiliary do: the road conditions do not make cycling safe.

× It's not safe to ride a bike in our roads so people used to drive cars more than bikes, even

✓ It's not safe to ride a bike on our roads, so people drive cars more often than they ride bikes.

Use on, rather than in, with roads because a road is treated as a surface. For example, we say drive on a road and cycle on a road.

× It's not safe to ride a bike in our roads so people used to drive cars more than bikes, even

✓ It's not safe to ride a bike on our roads, so people drive cars more often than they ride bikes.

The question asks about current popularity, so the present simple drive is more suitable than used to drive, which describes a past habit that is no longer true or has changed.

× It's not safe to ride a bike in our roads so people used to drive cars more than bikes, even

✓ It's not safe to ride a bike on our roads, so people drive cars more often than they ride bikes.

The original comparison is between drive cars and bikes, which are not parallel objects or actions. Use more often than they ride bikes to compare the frequency of driving with the frequency of riding.