Parks— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: Make the response more natural and concise: state directly that you liked parks, give one clear reason and one brief detail. Fix grammar (use past tense consistently) and avoid repetition.

Exemplo: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child because I was very energetic and needed space to run around. For example, I used to spend hours playing tag with neighbourhood friends, which helped me burn off energy and have fun.

Sugestão: Answer directly, use correct tense and reduce filler words. Give a clear activity and a specific benefit using a linking phrase (for example, 'because' or 'so').

Exemplo: Yes, I still like going to parks. I go almost every weekday to jog or walk because it helps me relax and re-energise after work.

Sugestão: Start with a clear opinion (Yes/No) then give two specific reasons connected by linking words. Correct grammar and avoid vague phrases like 'strategy' and unfinished sentences.

Exemplo: Yes, I would like to see more parks in Taipei because the city is built-up and can feel very hot in summer. More parks would provide shade and cleaner air, and they would offer pleasant places for people to relax.

Sugestão: Give a direct answer naming the park, then add one or two specific reasons why you want to visit using linking words. Use accurate vocabulary (e.g. 'ponds', 'trees') and avoid hesitation words.

Exemplo: Definitely — I would love to visit Central Park in New York because it's famous and very large. For instance, I imagine walking around its ponds and tree-lined paths and chatting with other visitors while enjoying the scenery.

× Well, I did like to go to park as a child because I'm a very I was a outgoing kid that I had bunch of energies have to be released.

✓ Well, I did like to go to the park as a child because I was a very outgoing kid who had a lot of energy to release.

Errors: missing definite article before 'park' (use 'the park' for a general place), incorrect mixed tenses and redundant phrasing ('I'm a very I was a outgoing'—remove present 'I'm' and keep past 'I was'), incorrect relative pronoun and clause structure ('that I had bunch of energies have to be released' is ungrammatical), 'bunch of energies' is incorrect: use 'a lot of energy'. Suggestion: keep consistent past tense when describing childhood, use 'the park', use 'who' for people clauses, and replace informal noun phrases with 'a lot of energy'.

× So park is the best place they meet you.

✓ So the park was the best place for me to release it.

Errors: missing article before 'park', unclear pronoun use ('they meet you' doesn't fit context), and tense mismatch. The student refers to personal experience, so use 'the park was the best place for me' and clarify the action (to release energy). Suggestion: use clear subject and object, keep past tense for childhood descriptions.

× Actually, I go to parks every day of the work currently, so I think yes, I still like going to parks now, umm, going to the parks with, umm, jogging or walking can make me uh, refill and uh, have.

✓ Actually, I currently go to parks every working day, so I still like going to parks now. Going to the parks to jog or walk refreshes me and makes me feel better.

Errors: awkward word order 'every day of the work' should be 'every working day' or 'on working days'; redundant 'currently' and 'now'—one is enough; verb agreement and form: 'going...can make me refill and have' is incorrect—use 'refreshes me' and 'makes me feel better'. Suggestion: use present simple for habitual actions, correct collocations ('working day', 'refreshes me'), and avoid filler words.

× That would be a very fantastic, uh, strategy because I, uh, reside in the city in Taipei, which has a lot of buildings and make us feel very hot in summer.

✓ That would be a fantastic idea because I live in Taipei, which has many buildings and makes it feel very hot in summer.

Errors: 'a very fantastic' is redundant; 'strategy' is unnatural here—'idea' fits better. Tense: use present simple 'I live' not 'I reside in the city in Taipei' (wordy). Subject-verb agreement: 'which has a lot of buildings and make us feel' should be 'which has many buildings and makes it feel'. Suggestion: use concise vocabulary, correct subject-verb agreement, and appropriate articles ('many buildings').

× If we can have more parks that will be have more fresh air and umm.

✓ If we could have more parks, we would have more fresh air.

Errors: conditional structure incorrect ('If we can have' vs 'If we could have' or 'If we have'); extra 'be' in 'will be have'; sentence incomplete. Suggestion: choose correct conditional (first or second) and complete the result clause; remove filler words.

× Definitely I heard like the Central Park in New York is a famous place for every tourist to New York and uh, in my imagination is very huge.

✓ Definitely, I heard that Central Park in New York is a famous place for every tourist to New York, and in my imagination it is very huge.

Errors: unnecessary article 'the' before 'Central Park' can be omitted but 'Central Park' is a proper noun—'Central Park in New York' is fine with or without 'the'; the sentence needs 'that' after 'heard' for a noun clause, and 'in my imagination is very huge' needs subject 'it'. Suggestion: include 'that' after 'heard' and supply the subject 'it' in the second clause.

× It has the pound trees and you can have some small talk with the tourists there and, uh, interact with them to chat.

✓ It has ponds and trees, and you can have small talks with tourists there and interact with them.

Errors: 'pound trees' is incorrect—likely intended 'ponds and trees' or 'round trees' but 'ponds and trees' fits parks; 'small talk' is uncountable often used without 'some' but 'have small talk with tourists' or 'make small talk' is better; 'interact with them to chat' is redundant—'interact with them' or 'chat with them' suffices. Suggestion: use correct nouns ('ponds'), correct collocations ('make small talk' or 'have small talk'), and avoid redundancy.