Part 1
시험관
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
수험생
Yes, I had a pink bike that has four wheels for support.
시험관
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
수험생
I think it's popular especially among the all elders, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed accordingly to the bikes and also I think it is kind of expensive in comparing it.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
점수: 70.0제안: Doğrudan yanıt vermeniz iyi, ancak geçmişten bahsettiğiniz için “has” yerine “had” kullanmalısınız. Dört küçük destek tekerleğini anlatmak için daha doğal olan “training wheels” ifadesini kullanın. Cevabınızı kısa bir ayrıntıyla, örneğin bisikleti ne zaman kullandığınızı söyleyerek geliştirebilirsiniz.
예시: Yes, I had a pink bike with training wheels when I was little. I used to ride it around the park with my family.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
점수: 52.0제안: Fikir belirtmeniz ve neden sunmanız olumlu; ancak “bikes” çoğul olduğu için “they” kullanın ve “among the all elders” yerine “among older people” deyin. Ulaşım aracı olarak yaygın olmadığını açıklarken “the roads aren’t designed for cyclists” daha doğal bir ifadedir. Son bölümde “expensive in comparing it” yerine neyin pahalı olduğunu açıkça belirtin; örneğin yeni bisikletlerin pahalı olduğunu söyleyin. Cevabı daha anlaşılır olması için iki kısa cümleye bölün.
예시: Bikes are fairly popular in my country, especially among older people. However, they aren’t widely used for commuting because many roads aren’t designed for cyclists, and good-quality bikes can be expensive.
× Yes, I had a pink bike that has four wheels for support.
✓ Yes, I had a pink bike that had four wheels for support.
The sentence describes a bike the student had as a child, so the verb in the relative clause should also be in the past tense. Use had instead of has.
× I think it's popular especially among the all elders, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed accordingly to the bikes and also I think it is kind of expensive in comparing it.
✓ I think it's popular, especially among all the elderly people, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed accordingly to the bikes, and also I think it is kind of expensive in comparing it.
The quantifier all comes before the definite article the, not after it. Say all the elderly people, not the all elders.
× I think it's popular especially among the all elders, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed accordingly to the bikes and also I think it is kind of expensive in comparing it.
✓ I think it's popular especially among all the elderly people, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed for bikes, and also I think it is kind of expensive in comparing it.
Designed for is the appropriate expression when explaining the purpose something was made for. Accordingly to is not correct in this context. Use designed for bikes.
× I think it's popular especially among the all elders, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed accordingly to the bikes and also I think it is kind of expensive in comparing it.
✓ I think it's popular especially among all the elderly people, but it's not that common to use it as a way of transportation because the roads are not designed for bikes, and also I think it is kind of expensive compared with other forms of transportation.
In comparing it is not idiomatic in this context. Use compared with when stating that something is expensive relative to another option. Name the comparison, such as other forms of transportation, to make the meaning clear.