Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答基本无法理解，且没有清楚地直接回答是否有自行车。先用一句话明确回答，再说明原因；如果想表达家里买不起，可以说“my family couldn't afford one”。注意使用过去时，例如“when I was a child”，并删除与问题无关或意思不清的内容。建议控制在两三句。

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. My family couldn’t really afford one at the time, so I usually walked or took public transport.

제안: 开头的否定回答不够自然，后面的内容也与问题联系不清。请先明确说明自行车是否普及，再给出一个具体原因或例子。可以提到香港人口密集、公共交通方便或道路繁忙；使用“because”“for example”等连接词，并避免加入无关内容。

예시: I wouldn’t say bikes are very popular in Hong Kong. The city has a dense population and a convenient public transport system, so many people prefer taking the MTR or buses. Also, cycling can be difficult in busy areas.

× I'm not really rich when I was child.

✓ I wasn't really rich when I was a child.

这句话描述的是童年时期的情况，应使用一般过去时。原句在 when 从句中使用了过去时 was，但主句使用现在时 I'm，时态不一致。可改为 wasn't。此外，child 前需要加不定冠词 a。

× I was child.

✓ I was a child.

child 是可数名词单数，前面通常需要使用冠词。这里应在 child 前加不定冠词 a。

× Does Ireland, Hong Kong have multiple people and likely to use no car or just a diverse taxis or whatever and bicycles?

✓ Do people in Ireland and Hong Kong tend to use cars or taxis rather than bicycles?

原句的主语和句子结构不清楚。若主语是 Ireland 和 Hong Kong 的居民，复数主语 people 应与 do 搭配，而不能使用 does。修改后的句子使用复数主语 people，因此用 do。

× Does Ireland, Hong Kong have multiple people and likely to use no car or just a diverse taxis or whatever and bicycles?

✓ Do people in Ireland and Hong Kong tend to use cars or taxis rather than bicycles?

原句把国家、人数以及出行方式等内容混在一起，句子结构不完整，读者难以判断主语和谓语的关系。可以先明确主语是 people，再用 tend to use 引出出行方式，并用 rather than 表示“而不是”。