Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答基本直接，但时态错误：问题使用一般过去时“Did you have...”，应回答“No, I didn’t.” 另外，可以补充一个简短原因或相关细节，使答案更完整，例如说明你小时候没有自行车以及原因。注意在“No”后加逗号，并避免只给出过于简短的回答。

예시: No, I didn’t. My parents thought cycling on the busy roads near our home was unsafe, so I usually walked or took the bus instead.

제안: 回答包含观点和原因，结构基本清楚，但有几处明显错误和不自然表达：应将“money bikes”改为“many bikes”，“have have”删掉一个“have”，并把“better life levels”改为更自然的“a higher standard of living”或“better living conditions”。建议使用“because”连接原因，并补充具体场景，例如城市道路、自行车道或通勤用途。

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country. There are many bicycles on the roads, especially in large cities, because people are becoming more health-conscious and cycling is also a convenient way to commute.

× No I haven't.

✓ No, I didn't.

问题对应的问句是一般过去时“Did you have...?”，因此回答也应使用一般过去时“didn't”，而不能使用现在完成时“haven't”。可以根据问句中的助动词和时态来简短回答：Did you...? — Yes, I did. / No, I didn't.

× Yes, there are money bikes on the road because people in my country have have better life levels than before.

✓ Yes, there are many bikes on the road because people in my country have better living standards than before.

“money”不能表示“许多”，这里应使用数量词“many”。另外，“have have”重复使用了两个动词，造成句子结构错误，保留一个“have”即可。表达“生活水平”时，“living standards”比“life levels”更自然。