Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Use the past tense consistently: say “I had” instead of “I have.” Avoid repeating “yeah, yes” and using several fillers such as “uh.” The phrase “It is. It was” is incomplete and self-corrected awkwardly; replace it with one clear sentence. Answer directly and add one specific detail about the bike or how you used it.

예시: Yes, I had a small toy bike when I was a child. It was red, and I used to ride it around my neighborhood. I have fond memories of learning to ride it.

제안: Use the correct comparative form “more popular,” but avoid claiming that bikes are more popular than every other form of transport unless this is accurate. Replace “a group of people which can't afford” with “some people who can't afford cars.” Avoid redundant phrases such as “bicycle bikes” and “use mostly.” Organize the answer with a clear reason and a specific example, using a linking word such as “because” or “as a result.”

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially among students and people who cannot afford cars. They are affordable and convenient for short journeys. In addition, many people use them to exercise and avoid traffic congestion.

× Yeah, yes, I have a small toy bike when I was a child.

✓ Yeah, yes, I had a small toy bike when I was a child.

The time expression when I was a child refers to a finished period in the past, so the past-tense form had is required instead of the present-tense form have.

× Uh, it is. It was a pleasant memory, uh, for me, uh.

✓ It was a pleasant memory for me.

It is is an incomplete and unnecessary sentence fragment in this context. Use one complete sentence with the past-tense verb was because the memory relates to the speaker's childhood.

× Yes, in my country bikes are much popular than any other ride.

✓ Yes, in my country, bikes are more popular than any other means of transportation.

The comparative form of popular is more popular, not much popular. Also, means of transportation is a more appropriate comparison object than ride when discussing different ways to travel.

× There's a group of people which can't afford, who can't afford cars.

✓ There is a group of people who cannot afford cars.

Use who, not which, to refer to people. The original sentence also repeats the relative clause and leaves cannot afford without an object in its first occurrence, so the sentence should contain one complete relative clause: who cannot afford cars.

× So basically they use mostly bicycle bikes for travel and for other purpose.

✓ So basically, they mostly use bicycles for travel and for other purposes.

The adverb mostly is placed more naturally before the main verb use when it describes how frequently the action occurs. The revised sentence also avoids the redundant expression bicycle bikes.

× So basically they use mostly bicycle bikes for travel and for other purpose.

✓ So basically, they mostly use bicycles for travel and for other purposes.

The phrase other purposes refers to more than one possible use, so the plural form purposes is needed. The noun bicycles is also plural because it follows they and refers to bicycles generally.