Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Answer the question directly in the first sentence and use the past tense consistently: “I had” and “was given.” Avoid unnatural expressions such as “fills me some comfortables” and unclear phrases such as “for the eating.” Organize the answer with a linking word such as “because” or “so,” and describe one or two specific uses of the bike. Keep the response to two or three clear sentences.

예시: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. My father gave it to me as a birthday present, and I was delighted because I could ride it to the market or to my friends’ houses. It was very useful for short trips around my neighborhood.

제안: State your opinion clearly and use correct subject–verb agreement and articles: “Bikes are popular” and “a primary means of transport.” Avoid repeating words such as “some” and “some places,” and replace unclear phrases like “city type” with “urban areas.” Develop the answer with two specific reasons, such as avoiding traffic and being affordable, and use a linking word like “ bovendien,” “because,” or “also” to connect the ideas.

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially in crowded cities. They are an affordable and convenient way to travel because people can avoid traffic and reach nearby places quickly. In addition, many people ride bicycles for exercise and to enjoy the outdoors.

× I have a splendid bike when I was a child.

✓ I had a splendid bike when I was a child.

The phrase when I was a child refers to a finished period in the past, so the past-tense form had is required instead of the present-tense form have.

× It was gifted to me by my father and it fills me some comfortables for my daily routine trips.

✓ It was given to me by my father, and it provided me with comfort during my daily trips.

The original sentence has an incorrect structure and uses comfortables incorrectly. Comfort is an uncountable noun, and the correct structure is provide someone with comfort.

× It fills me some comfortables for my daily routine trips.

✓ It provided me with comfort during my daily trips.

Because the student is describing childhood, the verb should be in the past tense: provided, not fills.

× It provided me with comfort for my daily trips.

✓ It provided me with comfort during my daily trips.

During is the appropriate preposition for describing the time when the trips took place. For does not express this meaning as naturally here.

× I used it to go to like market or some other places.

✓ I used it to go to the market or some other places.

A singular, countable noun such as market normally needs a determiner. The definite article the is appropriate when referring to a particular market.

× So from there supermarkets.

✓ So, I used it to go to supermarkets.

The original fragment has no main verb or clear subject. A complete sentence needs a subject, such as I, and a verb, such as used or went.

× The bikes are popular in my country.

✓ Bikes are popular in my country.

When talking about bikes as a general category, the definite article the is not normally used. The plural noun bikes can be used without an article for a general statement.

× It was a primary vehicles for taking things from a market.

✓ They were a primary means of transporting things from the market.

Vehicles is plural, so it cannot be used with the singular pronoun it and the singular verb was. The correction uses they were for plural agreement.

× It was a primary vehicle.

✓ They were a primary means of transportation.

If the subject is plural, the verb must also be plural: bikes were, not bikes was. The correction also avoids the mismatch between a singular vehicle and a plural subject.

× There was a more traffic there.

✓ There was more traffic there.

Traffic is an uncountable noun, so it is not used with the indefinite article a. The correct expression is more traffic.

× There was more traffic there, and we can also go by bike.

✓ There was more traffic there, and we could also go by bike.

The answer describes circumstances in the past, so can should change to its past form could.

× We can also go with my preference to enjoy the trips by the bike.

✓ I also preferred to use the bike to enjoy my trips.

The pronouns we and my do not agree logically. If the speaker is describing a personal preference, I and my should be used consistently.

× We could also go by the bike.

✓ We could also go by bike.

The expression by bike is used when talking about the means of transportation in general, so the article the is usually omitted.