Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your answer is grammatically correct but too short and lacks detail. To improve, give a direct topic sentence then add 1–2 specific supporting details (brief reason, a memory, or a comparison). Use a linking word to connect ideas (for example: because, so, although). Keep it natural and no more than 3–4 sentences.

예시: No, I didn’t. I grew up in a busy city where people mostly used buses and motorbikes, so my family never bought a bicycle. Because of that, I remember learning to balance on curbs instead of riding on the road.

제안: The answer directly addresses the question but is flat and general. Improve by adding a specific reason and an example, and use a linking word to make the response coherent (for example: mainly because, however, for instance). Aim for 2–4 short sentences and vary vocabulary (e.g., bicycles, cycling, motorbikes, public transport).

예시: No, bikes aren’t very popular in my country, mainly because traffic and poor cycling infrastructure make riding unsafe. For instance, most people prefer scooters or buses for their daily commute, so you rarely see cyclists on main roads.

× No, bikes are not popular in my country.

✓ No, bikes aren't popular in my country.

The student used a grammatically correct sentence, but contracted forms are more natural in spoken English. This is not a grammatical error per the provided list, but improving to the contraction 'aren't' matches spoken style and maintains the present simple tense required by the question. Suggestion: use natural spoken contractions and keep subject-verb agreement.