Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be more natural and expand slightly with a brief reason or context. Use a full sentence and add one supporting detail. Keep it concise (max 5 sentences) and use linking words if adding more than one idea.

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. I grew up in a city where there wasn’t much space to ride, so my parents preferred I walk or use public transport.

제안: Give a direct topic sentence then support it with a specific reason or example. Avoid generalizations without evidence; use linking words like 'because' or 'for example' to make your point clearer and more natural.

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, but they tend to be more common among boys because families often buy them for boys as toys. For example, I see many boys riding bikes in my neighbourhood, whereas fewer girls cycle to school.

× No, I didn't have.

✓ No, I didn't.

The original sentence 'No, I didn't have.' is incomplete because 'have' is a main verb that requires an object when used this way ('have a bike'). In response to 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?' the short negative answer should be 'No, I didn't.' which omits the main verb and is grammatically correct in conversational English. Suggestion: use the short form 'I didn't' for brevity or include the object: 'No, I didn't have a bike.' depending on formality.

× Yes, of course they are, but more for boys, not for girls.

✓ Yes, of course they are, but they're more for boys than for girls.

The original sentence 'but more for boys, not for girls' is awkward and less precise. Using 'they're more for boys than for girls' makes the comparison clear and uses the pronoun 'they' correctly to refer to 'bikes.' Also contracting 'they are' to 'they're' is natural in speech. Suggestion: use 'more... than...' structure for comparisons and ensure pronouns clearly refer to the noun.