Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be concise and avoid repetition. Start with a clear topic sentence that directly answers the question, then add one or two brief supporting details (why you didn’t have one or what you had instead). Use linking words if you add details. Also use precise vocabulary (e.g., "scooter," "tricycle," "borrowed"). Keep it under five sentences.

예시: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child. Instead, I had a small tricycle that my parents bought for me, which I used in the yard until I was old enough to try a neighbor’s bicycle.

제안: Give a direct opinion followed by specific reasons and use linking words to connect points. Avoid filler words ("say," "uh") and grammar errors. Provide one or two concrete examples or comparisons (e.g., traffic, cost, city layout). Keep answers natural and within five sentences.

예시: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country because they are more convenient than cars for short trips and they cost much less to buy and maintain. For example, many people use bicycles to commute to work in crowded city centers where parking is difficult.

× I think bikes are popular in my country because say I'm more convenient than cars.

✓ I think bikes are popular in my country because they are more convenient than cars.

The original sentence contains a wrong word 'say' and an incorrect pronoun phrase 'I'm' that do not match the subject 'bikes'. This is a subject-reference and word-choice error. Replace 'say I'm' with 'they are' so the pronoun agrees with the plural noun 'bikes' and the sentence becomes grammatically correct and clear. Suggestion: ensure the pronoun refers back to the intended noun and avoid inserting unrelated words like 'say'. This corresponds to subject-verb/pronoun agreement and incorrect word usage (map to IDs 12 and 27).

× No, I didn't. No, I didn't. But I had a bicycle.

✓ No, I didn't, but I had a bicycle.

Repeating 'No, I didn't.' twice is unnecessary and makes the response awkward. Combining the clauses with a comma and lowercase 'but' creates a single coherent sentence. This is a sentence structure and clarity issue; remove redundant repetition and join the clauses for natural speech. This maps to sentence-structure problems (ID 26).