Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Cải thiện ngữ pháp cơ bản và tính mạch lạc. Bạn nên trả lời trực tiếp bằng một câu chủ đề rõ ràng (ví dụ: “No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child.”), sau đó bổ sung 1–2 câu chi tiết cụ thể, tránh lỗi thì và từ không phù hợp (ví dụ “When I was a child” thay vì “When I work case”, dùng “walked” thay vì “walk” nếu nói về quá khứ). Ngoài ra hãy dùng liên từ đơn giản để nối ý (for example, so, because).

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. Instead, I usually walked to school with my grandmother because our house was nearby. Walking was a good time for us to talk, and I remember it fondly.

제안: Sắp xếp ý rõ ràng và dùng từ vựng chính xác. Bắt đầu bằng câu chủ đề nêu quan điểm rõ ràng (Yes or No), sau đó giải thích với lý do cụ thể và một ví dụ hoặc so sánh. Tránh lặp từ và sửa lỗi cấu trúc (ví dụ “are common” thay vì “I'm a common”, “convenient” cần được dùng đúng ngữ cảnh). Dùng liên từ như “however”, “because”, “for example” để mạch lạc.

예시: I don’t think bikes are very popular in my country. Although some people use them, most people prefer motorbikes or cars because they are faster and more convenient for long distances. For example, in cities many commuters choose motorbikes due to traffic and distance.

× When I work case, I didn't have a bike.

✓ When I was a child, I didn't have a bike.

The original sentence mixes present tense 'work' with past context and contains an incorrect phrase 'work case'. The question asks about the past, so use past-tense 'was' to state a past condition. Suggestion: use 'When I was a child' or 'When I was younger' to introduce past habits or situations.

× Instead I walk.

✓ Instead I walked.

The context is past (did you have a bike when you were a child?), so the verb should be in the past tense. 'Walk' is present; change to 'walked'. Suggestion: keep consistent past tense for actions that happened in childhood.

× I often walk to school with my grandma's grandfather.

✓ I often walked to school with my grandfather.

The phrase 'grandma's grandfather' is confusing and likely incorrect. It also mixes possessive structure unnecessarily. Use 'grandfather' if referring to the student's grandfather. Also change 'walk' to past 'walked' to match past context.

× Not really, uh, in my country more to buy.

✓ Not really. Bicycles are not very common to buy in my country.

The original fragment is ungrammatical and missing a clear subject and verb. Recast the idea into a full sentence with subject 'Bicycles' and verb 'are' and an adjective phrase 'not very common to buy' to express the intended meaning.

× Uh, so I'm a common means of transportation because a very convenient and it can have it can have people set time to traveling to travel.

✓ So they are not a common means of transportation because they are not very convenient, and people cannot easily schedule travel with them.

The original sentence has multiple structural problems: incorrect subject 'I'm' instead of 'they', missing articles, repeated phrases 'it can have it can have', and awkward infinitive use. Reconstruct to use correct subject-verb agreement ('they are'), consistent adjectives ('not very convenient'), and a clear clause explaining why people do not use bikes ('people cannot easily schedule travel with them').