Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Votre réponse est claire et naturelle, mais vous pouvez l'améliorer en ajoutant un détail spécifique et une courte raison ou mémoire pour l'enrichir. Utilisez une ou deux phrases de soutien avec un mot de liaison pour la cohérence (par exemple «because» ou «and»). Évitez les répétitions et gardez la réponse concise (max 4–5 phrases).

예시: Yes, I did. I had a bright red bicycle when I was a kid, and I rode it to school every day. Because it was light and fast, I often raced my friends on weekends.

제안: La réponse est trop brève et manque de détails et de justification. Pour améliorer, donnez une opinion claire suivie d'explications ou d'exemples concrets en utilisant des connecteurs (par exemple «because», «however», «for example»). Ajoutez une comparaison ou une conséquence pour montrer réflexion. Respectez la limite de phrases (3–4 phrases suffisent).

예시: Not really; bikes aren't very popular in my country because cities are designed for cars and public transport is more convenient. For example, most people commute by bus or motorcycle, so cycling is mainly seen as a recreational activity rather than a daily mode of transport.

× No I don't, bikes are not that popular in my country

✓ No, I don't think bikes are that popular in my country.

The sentence lacks proper subject-verb structure for the clause expressing an opinion. In conversational English, the verb 'think' is required after 'I don't' to complete the idea. Also a comma after 'No' improves clarity. Suggestion: include the verb 'think' to form a complete clause ('I don't think ...') and add a comma after interjections like 'No' to separate it from the main clause.'