Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: The response does not answer the examiner's question and appears to be a question back to the examiner, which breaks Basic Structure and Content rules. To improve, answer directly with a clear topic sentence (yes/no or short statement), then add 1–2 supporting details using linking words (for example, because / so / although). Keep it natural and concise (no more than 5 sentences).

예시: Yes, I did have a bike when I was a child. It was a small red bicycle with training wheels, and I learned to ride it in my neighborhood park. Because my parents encouraged me to play outside, I spent many afternoons practicing until I felt confident.

제안: The answer is short and direct but too brief and unsupported. Improve by giving a topic sentence and then 1–2 specific supporting details or examples using linking words (for example, however / because / for instance). This will make your response more informative and natural while staying concise.

예시: No, not really; cars and public transport are more common in my city because the roads are busy and distances are long. However, bikes are becoming more popular recently in some areas for short commutes, especially among students and young professionals.

× Did you have a bag when you were a child?

✓ Yes, I did.

The student repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. This is a sentence structure/response error: the reply should be a statement answering the question, not another question. Suggestion: Answer directly using correct tense and auxiliary: 'Yes, I did.' or 'No, I didn't.' and if adding detail, use past tense: 'Yes, I did. I had a bike when I was a child.'

× No, not really.

✓ No, not really.

This response is grammatically acceptable as a short answer to 'Do you think bikes are popular in your country?' It uses present simple opinion. No correction needed. Suggestion: To expand, give a full sentence: 'No, not really. I don't think bikes are very popular in my country.'