Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答过于简短，缺乏细节和结构。建议先用一句主题句直接回答，再用1–2句具体细节（比如什么时候、有怎样的自行车、谁送的、骑车的经历或感受），并用连接词如“because”或“and”使回答连贯。句子长度控制在3–5句内，自然用词即可。

예시: Yes, I did. I had a small red bicycle when I was about eight years old, which my parents bought for me. I used to ride it to the park with my friends every weekend because it was a fun way to spend time outdoors.

제안: 回答过于笼统，缺乏支持性细节和例证。建议先给出直接观点，然后用1–2句原因或例子支持（比如在哪些城市流行、用于通勤还是运动、共享单车的普及等），并使用连接词如“because”、“for example”来增强逻辑性。保持3–5句，使用与话题相关的词汇。

예시: Yes, I do. Bikes are quite popular in many cities because they are cheap and convenient for short trips. For example, shared-bike schemes are common in my city, and many people use bicycles to commute to work or go shopping.

× Yes, I did.

✓ Yes, I did.

该回答与前一问题“Did you have a bike when you were a child?”的时态和语法一致。使用过去时的助动词 did 加短答“Yes, I did.” 完全正确，无需修改。

× Yes, I do.

✓ Yes, I do.

该回答与问题“Do you think bikes are popular in your country?”的时态和语法一致。使用现在时的助动词 do 加短答“Yes, I do.” 完全正确，无需修改。