Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be slightly more natural and expand a bit using a topic sentence and one brief supporting detail. Use a contraction and give a short reason or memory to make the answer more informative and fluent. Keep it within 2–3 sentences and avoid unnecessary hesitations.

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. I preferred walking or taking the bus because my family lived close to my school, so a bike wasn’t necessary.

제안: Improve clarity, grammar and coherence. Start with a clear topic sentence, use linking words (for example, because, so), avoid filler sounds (uh), and give one or two specific details (who uses them and why). Keep the answer to 2–3 sentences and correct comparative phrasing.

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country because many young people use them to travel to school and for short trips. In addition, they are more affordable and easier to park than cars, so they are a practical choice for daily use.

× No, I didn't have.

✓ No, I didn't.

The question 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?' uses the auxiliary did, so the short negative answer should use 'didn't' alone. Repeating the base verb 'have' after 'didn't' is unnecessary and ungrammatical in English. Use 'No, I didn't.' for a concise, correct response.

× S bikes are popular in my country because mostly young people use them for uh traveling to schools and short trips and it is affordable uh then other.

✓ Bikes are popular in my country because mostly young people use them for traveling to school and short trips, and they are more affordable than other options.

Several issues: 'S bikes' appears to be a typo; use 'Bikes'. 'Traveling to schools' is unnatural when referring to going to school in general—use 'traveling to school'. 'It is affordable then other' has multiple problems: subject 'it' doesn't match plural 'bikes', so use 'they'; comparative should be 'more affordable than other options'. Also remove filler 'uh' for clarity and add a comma before 'and' for readability. These corrections fix agreement, article/word choice, and comparative structure.