Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your answer is natural and direct but very short. To improve, keep the clear topic sentence and add one or two concise supporting details (e.g., where you rode it, who taught you, or a memory) linked with a simple connector such as 'and' or 'so'. Avoid redundancy like 'did have' — use 'Yes, I had a bike.' Aim for 2–4 sentences total.

예시: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I learned to ride it in my neighborhood park, and my older brother taught me how to balance and brake safely. I used to ride it to my friend's house almost every afternoon.

제안: Your answer addresses the question but has grammatical errors and unclear phrasing. Improve by stating your opinion clearly, then give specific reasons linked with connectors like 'because' or 'mainly due to'. Use correct grammar (e.g., 'there are not many bike lanes' instead of 'no lots of way for them'). Keep to 2–3 sentences with clearer vocabulary.

예시: I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because most people prefer cars. This is mainly because there are not many bike lanes or safe routes for cyclists, and public infrastructure is geared toward cars.

× Yes, I did have a bike when I was a kid.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a kid.

Using 'did' with the main verb in an affirmative past-tense sentence is unnecessary and ungrammatical here. In simple past affirmative statements, use the past form of the verb alone (had). Suggestion: remove the auxiliary 'did' for affirmative past tense sentences.

× I don't think so, because my country depends on cars more than bikes.

✓ I don't think so, because people in my country rely on cars more than on bikes.

The original sentence uses 'my country depends on cars,' which anthropomorphizes a country and is awkward. Also 'depends on' is acceptable but 'rely on' with 'people in my country' is more natural. Suggestion: refer to people rather than the country as an agent and use 'rely on' and include 'on' after 'more than' for clarity.

× It's not popular even in the street.

✓ Bicycles are not very popular even on the streets.

'It's' is vague and singular; the student likely means 'bicycles' (plural). 'In the street' is less natural than 'on the streets.' Also 'not popular' is better modified with 'very' for nuance. Suggestion: use the plural noun 'bicycles' and the preposition 'on' with 'streets.'

× There is no lots of way for them.

✓ There are not many bike lanes or paths for them.

'There is no lots of way' is ungrammatical: 'lots of' cannot follow 'no,' and 'way' should be plural or more specific. Use 'there are not many' or 'there aren't many' with a plural noun like 'bike lanes' or 'paths.' Also align verb number: use 'are' with plural. Suggestion: replace vague phrase with a clear plural noun and correct quantifier structure.