Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your response simply repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. Give a clear, direct topic sentence stating whether you had a bike, then add one or two brief supporting details (age, how often you rode, or a memorable moment). Keep to a maximum of about 3–4 sentences and use linking words like "when" or "and" to connect ideas.

예시: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I got it when I was seven and rode it to school and the park almost every day. Because the neighborhood was quiet, I often practiced tricks with my friends, which made those years very fun.

제안: Your answer is too short, ends abruptly, and lacks specific supporting details. Start with a clear opinion, then explain why with specific reasons (e.g., cost, traffic, environment, leisure) and finish with a short consequence or example. Use linking words such as "because", "so", or "therefore" to make it coherent, and avoid sentence fragments.

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in Brazil because they are an affordable and convenient way to travel in busy cities. For example, many people cycle short distances to work or to buy groceries, and there are also growing bike-share programs in large cities. As a result, cycling has become both a practical and environmentally friendly option for many Brazilians.

× Did you have a bike when you were a child?

✓ Yes, I did.

The student's reply repeats the examiner's question and lacks a clear answer. This is a sentence structure error (ID 26). Provide a short past-tense response that matches the question: 'Did you have...?' requires 'Yes, I did' or 'No, I didn't.' Avoid repeating the question; answer directly and concisely.

× Yes, a lot of people use bikes because I live in Brazil and. That's it.

✓ Yes, many people use bikes where I live in Brazil because commuting by bike is common.

The original sentence is incomplete and awkwardly connected, which is a sentence structure error (ID 26). 'A lot of people' is acceptable but 'and.' is a fragment. Also 'use bikes because I live in Brazil and.' lacks a clear clause. The corrected version completes the thought, uses 'many' as a smoother quantifier, and provides a reason clause. Suggestion: avoid sentence fragments, connect clauses logically, and use complete reasons (e.g., 'because commuting by bike is common').