Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Be careful with tense consistency, word choice and pronunciation. Start with a clear topic sentence in the past tense (you are describing a childhood possession), then add one or two brief supporting details. Use correct words (bike, not buy) and avoid mixing present and past tenses. Keep it within 2–3 sentences and use a linking word if you add a reason or detail.

예시: Yes — I had a bicycle when I was a child. It was a small red bike that I used to ride to my friend’s house every afternoon, and I stopped using it when I started commuting by scooter.

제안: Give a concise main idea then support it with specific examples and correct collocations. Use linking words (for example, because, so) and avoid repetition. Use correct noun forms and collocations: "eco-friendly," "rental bikes," "short trips." Limit to 2–3 sentences for clarity.

예시: Yes, bikes are very popular in Taiwan because people care about eco-friendly transport. For example, there are many public rental bike schemes in cities that make short trips and commuting convenient and cheap.

× Yes I do, I did have a buy when I was little but now I only have a scooter.

✓ Yes I did. I had a bike when I was little, but now I only have a scooter.

This sentence contains multiple problems: wrong tense/auxiliary and a spelling error. The student uses 'Yes I do' which mismatches the past-tense question 'Did you have...' The correct short answer is 'Yes, I did.' Also 'I did have a buy' is incorrect: 'did have' is an unnecessary emphatic past; simpler and natural is 'I had a bike.' 'Buy' is a misspelling of 'bike.' Finally add a comma and conjunction before the contrast 'but' for clarity. Suggestion: match the past tense of the question by using 'did' and use correct noun spelling 'bike.' Use punctuation to separate clauses.

× Yes, absolutely, because nowadays people are focused on eco friendly.

✓ Yes, absolutely, because nowadays people are focused on being eco-friendly.

The phrase 'eco friendly' should be hyphenated as 'eco-friendly' when used as a compound modifier. More importantly, 'focused on eco-friendly' is incomplete; we need a gerund or noun after 'focused on,' for example 'being eco-friendly' or 'eco-friendly practices.' Suggestion: use 'focused on being eco-friendly' or 'focused on eco-friendly practices.'

× In Taiwan we have a lot of rental bike for helping, for people, to help them, for shortening, for shorter, for short traveling.

✓ In Taiwan we have a lot of rental bikes to help people with short trips.

Multiple issues: 'a lot of rental bike' is incorrect: 'a lot of' requires a plural noun 'rental bikes' (singular/plural issue). The phrase 'for helping, for people, to help them' is redundant and ungrammatical; use 'to help people.' 'For shortening, for shorter, for short traveling' tries to express 'for short journeys' or 'short trips.' Use 'short trips' which is natural. Overall simplify the clause to 'rental bikes to help people with short trips.' Suggestion: use plural 'bikes' and concise phrasing 'to help people with short trips.'