Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: The student's answer does not respond to the question. Give a direct, relevant reply about owning a bike in childhood. Keep it natural, 1–3 sentences, and add a specific supporting detail using a linking word (e.g., 'because', 'so', 'but').

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child because my family lived in a small apartment and there wasn’t space to store one. However, I often borrowed my friend’s bike to ride in the park on weekends.

제안: The student answered with another irrelevant question. Instead, directly state whether bikes are popular, then give a reason or example using a linking word (e.g., 'because', 'for example'). Keep responses concise and natural (no more than 5 sentences).

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and exercise. For example, bike lanes and rental schemes in cities have made cycling more convenient and common.

× No, I can't speak English.

✓ No, I didn't.

The examiner asked about possessing a bike in the past ('Did you have a bike when you were a child?'), so the student should answer using past tense rather than stating a current ability. Saying 'I can't speak English' is off-topic and mismatches tense and intent. Use a short past negative response 'No, I didn't.' or a full sentence 'No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child.' to be clear and grammatically correct.

× Do you think bags are plural in your country?

✓ Do you think bikes are popular in your country?

The examiner asked 'Do you think bikes are popular in your country?' The student's reply repeats the question but wrongly replaces 'bikes are popular' with 'bags are plural', which is an unrelated and incorrect construction. The correct approach is to answer the examiner's question about bikes and popularity. If asking for clarification, the student could say 'Do you mean bikes?' or answer directly: 'Yes, I think bikes are popular in my country.'